Skip to content

Lumbar Paravertebral Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of Lumbar Paravertebral Block and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07607509
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-05-26
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2027-08-31
Last updated
2026-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spine Disease

Brief summary

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of lumbar paravertebral block (L-PVB) and lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Effective postoperative pain management in this population is essential due to increased susceptibility to opioid-related adverse effects. Participants aged 65 years and older will be randomly assigned to receive either bilateral L-PVB or bilateral L-ESPB in addition to standardized general anesthesia. The primary objective is to evaluate differences in postoperative opioid consumption within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, intraoperative opioid use, time to mobilization, length of hospital stay, and incidence of opioid-related adverse events.

Detailed description

Lumbar spine surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, particularly in elderly patients, who are at increased risk of opioid-related adverse effects such as respiratory depression, sedation, delirium, and delayed mobilization. Regional anesthesia techniques may improve postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid requirements in this population. The lumbar paravertebral block (L-PVB) is a well-established technique providing segmental analgesia by targeting spinal nerves in the paravertebral space. The erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB), a newer interfascial plane block, has gained popularity due to its technical simplicity and favorable safety profile. However, comparative data on their effectiveness in lumbar spine surgery, especially in elderly patients, remain limited. This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing L-PVB and L-ESPB in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bilateral L-PVB or bilateral L-ESPB with a standardized dose of local anesthetic. All patients will receive a standardized general anesthesia protocol and multimodal analgesia regimen. Postoperative pain management will follow a uniform protocol across both groups. The primary endpoint is total opioid consumption within 48 hours after surgery, expressed as intravenous morphine equivalents. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores at predefined time points, time to first mobilization, length of hospital stay, use of rescue analgesia, and incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. Exploratory analyses will include assessment of inflammatory markers.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

Ultrasound-guided bilateral interfascial plane block performed at the lumbar level for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Sponsors

Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ge ≥65 years * Scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III * Ability to assess pain using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) * Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate * Chronic opioid therapy * Coagulation disorders * Use of anticoagulant therapy contraindicating regional anesthesia * Infection at the planned needle insertion site * Allergy to ropivacaine or other study-related medications * Severe hepatic failure * Severe renal failure * Cognitive impairment preventing reliable pain assessment * Inability to cooperate with study procedures * Extensive reoperation or surgery of unusually large extent that may interfere with outcome assessment * Contraindications to general anesthesia or regional anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total opioid consumption within 48 hours after surgery48 hours postoperativelyTotal cumulative opioid consumption within the first 48 hours after surgery, converted to intravenous morphine equivalents.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first rescue analgesia48 hours after surgeryTime from completion of the surgery to the administration of the first dose of rescue opioid analgesic (in minutes).
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)0 hours postoperativelyPain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)0 hours postoperativelyPain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) level12 hours after surgeryserum interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
NLR12 hours after surgeryneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
PLR12 hours after surgeryplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)

Countries

Poland

Contacts

CONTACTTomasz Reysner, MD PhD
treysner@ump.edu.pl+48 (61) 831-01-22
CONTACTGrzegorz Kowalski, MD PhD
gkowalski@ump.edu.pl
STUDY_CHAIRKatarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, MD PhD

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

STUDY_DIRECTORMałgorzata Reysner, Md PhD

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 27, 2026