Skip to content

Biodegradable Stents in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Pilot Study of Biodegradable STents in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis - BSTPSC

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07607353
Acronym
BSTPSC
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-05-26
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)

Keywords

PSC, ERCP, Biodegradable stents

Brief summary

In patients with PSC, endoscopic therapy of strictures aims to improve cholestasis by relieving the biliary obstruction via endoscopic biliary dilatation with consideration of plastic stents in strictures refractory to dilatation due to the risk of pancreatitis and cholangitis . Short term stents have been shown to have similar recurrence-free rates compared to dilatation in a randomised control trial; however, this was terminated after interim analysis due to higher rates of serious adverse events in the stent group. The long term benefits are unclear; however, it may lead to improved survival compared to predicted survival. In this group of patients with limited treatment options, biodegradable stents may provide an attractive additional treatment modality in the management of high grade strictures.

Detailed description

Research hypothesis The use of biodegradable stents leads to remodelling of high grade strictures in patients with PSC with fewer interventions in comparison to balloon dilation alone with a comparable risk profile to current therapy. Primary endpoint Technical success and safety of biodegradable stent placement at ERC Secondary endpoints * Cumulative recurrence -free rate of primary high grade strictures within 12 months * Change in symptoms as assessed by the Amsterdam cholestatic complaints score (ACCS) * Clinical success is defined by improvement in liver function tests (LFT) by 20% at week 2 and week 12. * Improvement in quality fo life as assessed by the Short form-36 (SF-36). * Mortality, morbidity, local complications, stricture recurrence, decompensation of liver disease, liver transplantation over 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEarchimedes stent

archimedes stent for HGS

Sponsors

King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* PSC patients with a high grade stricture

Exclusion criteria

* Prior stenting or balloon dilatation within the previous 4 months * Signs of bacterial cholangitis as defined by definite cholangitis * Change of UDCA therapy within 4 weeks * Inability to give informed consent * Biliary cirrhosis with Child Pugh score \> 8 * Estimated transplant free survival \< 2 years as calculated by Mayo score \> 2 * Suspicion of cholangiocarcinoma, reflected by an imaging study suggestive of metastasis, MRCP with mass lesion with contrast enhancenment, or rise in CA19.9 of \> 63 U/ml in the previous 4 months together with an absolute value \> 130 U/ml * Signs of current malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma * Life expectancy \< 24 months * Women pregnant at the time of screening * HIV or acute or chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C or substance (drug or alcohol) misure within the previous 2 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deployment of biodegradable stent placement across stricture at ERC in 20 patientsat time of primary ERCDeployment of stent across the stricture - yes or no

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative recurrence -free rate of primary high grade strictures within 12 months.through study completion up to 12 monthshas the stricture reoccured (yes or no) at 12 months post ERC and stent
Change in symptoms as assessed by the Amsterdam cholestatic complaints score (ACCS)Post ERC to assessment at 2 weeks and 12 weeks, and at 12 months.change in pruritus, fatigue, pain and fever
Clinical success is defined by improvement in liver function tests (LFT) by 20% at week 2 and week 12.At week 2 and 12 weeks post ERCPChange in liver blood tests: \- ALP, AST, ALT, Bilirubin
Change in quality fo life as assessed by the Short form-36 (SF-36after ERC and assesment at 2 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 monthsChange in QoL
Mortality over 12 months.Within 12 months of primary ERCPDeath related to PSC
morbidity related to ERCwithin 12 months of ERCComplications including cholangitis and pancreatitis post ERC
stricture recurrence post ERC12 months post ERCDevelopment of a stricture in the bile duct
Development of ascites post ercup to 12 months post ERCdevelopment of abdominal ascites post ERC
Need for liver transplantationup to 12 months following ERCpatients who are assessed and then listed for liver transplant

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDEEPAK JOSHI, PhD

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026