Skip to content

Comparative Study of Fishtail Versus Waisted Teardrop Closure Techniques in Mastectomy Patients

Comparative Study of Fishtail Versus Waisted Teardrop Closure Techniques in Mastectomy Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07606482
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-05-26
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2026-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Closure Technique

Brief summary

Investigators aimed to assess the comparative impact of two different closure techniques on cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction; investigators want to analysis operative time, wound healing and postoperative complications in both techniques

Interventions

PROCEDUREfishtail closure technique

In the Fishtail closure group, after standard mastectomy, the lateral flap was shaped into a fish-tail pattern and closed with interrupted sutures, ensuring an even tension distribution along the incision

PROCEDUREclosure technique waisted tear drop

In the Waisted Teardrop closure group, the lateral incision was designed in a teardrop shape with a narrowed waist, and closure was performed in layers to balance tension and reduce lateral dog-ear formation

Sponsors

University of Faisalabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

.Inclusion Criteria: * female patients aged 18 years or older sehdule for mastectomy * a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 35 kg/m² * willing and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* patients with BMI \<18.5 or \>35 kg/m² * those with inflammatory breast cancer, * prior breast surgery on the same side, * comorbidities significantly affecting wound healing, such as uncontrolled diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cosmetic outcomes1 YEARTo assesc osmetic outcome in terms of correction of dog-ear deformity (Yes/No)
patient satisfaction1 yearto assess patient satisfaction five-point Likert scale was used

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative time1 YEARAnalysis of operative time in minutes
wound healing1 yearwound healing time was measured in days
post operative complications1 yearseroma formation, wound dehiscence, flap necrosis, wound infections (frequency)

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 27, 2026