Implant Dentistry, Implant Loading, Osteotomy Protocols
Conditions
Brief summary
The study aimed to evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of Magnetic Mallet technique versus Conventional Drilling technique on early loaded implant in posterior maxilla.
Interventions
PROCEDUREMagnetic Mallet Technique
Osteotomy preparation for dental implant placement using a magneto-dynamic device (Magnetic Mallet) that delivers controlled percussive forces to condense bone and prepare the implant site in the posterior maxilla. Implants will be placed and early loaded after 2 months.
PROCEDUREConventional Drilling Technique
Osteotomy preparation for dental implant placement using traditional drilling technique in bone and prepare the implant site in the posterior maxilla. Implants will be placed and early loaded after 2 months.
Sponsors
Mansoura University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patient with missing one or more posterior maxillary teeth. * Patients in the age group between 18 and 50 years old. * 10 mm or more vertical bone height is present. * No gender preface in selection of the patients. * Good oral hygiene. * Non-smokers. * Patients willing to be present during the study follow up intervals. * Patients free from any systemic diseases. * 6 mm or more ridge width is present. * Crown height space of at least 8 mm. •!Patients without any para-functional habits (bruxism and clenching).
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with any pathological lesion or root tips at the planned surgical site. * Patients with systemic diseases that contra-indicate the surgical procedure or affect bone healing process such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders. * serious osseous disorders, and mental disorders. * Patient taking drugs that could affect bone healing process as in * Immunosuppressive drugs and bisphosphonates. * Alcoholism. * Untreated periodontal disease or bad oral hygiene. * Pregnancy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant stability | 9 months | The analysis of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) w made using an Osstell Mentor apparatus |
| Bone Density measurement | 9 months | Relative bone density records will be collected from the bucco-palatal view of the cross sectional plane using the Hounsfield unit |
| Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) | 9 months | For the calculation of marginal bone loss (MBL), the implant was used as a reference |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed