Skip to content

Assessment of Safety, Quality, and Acceptance of a Bowel Preparation Using a Food Kit With Laxatives

A Single-Center, Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded Study to Assess the Safety, Quality, and Tolerance of a Bowel Preparation Using a Food Kit With Laxatives in a United States Veteran Population

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07605897
Enrollment
57
Registered
2026-05-26
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2025-06-24
Last updated
2026-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bowel Preparation, Efficacy, Tolerability, Safety, Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy, Colon Cancer Screening

Keywords

colonoscopy, bowel preparation

Brief summary

The main purpose of this research study is to learn if an alternative bowel preparation (bowel prep) for colonoscopy is safe, tolerable and effective as compared to the standard bowel prep. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of the following bowel cleansing regimens for colonoscopy. * Standard Bowel Prep which includes a clear liquid diet the day before the scheduled procedure and two doses of a laxative, polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG-3350) taken with 4 liters of water. * Happy Colon Foods Bowel Prep which begins the day before the scheduled procedure and contains various low residue foods (foods that are easily digested and absorbed), and seven doses of laxatives including PEG-3350 taken with a total of about 4 liters of water, senna tablets, and one dose of magnesium citrate.

Interventions

OTHERUse of a standardized meal content (food-kit) the day prior to colonoscopy

Low-residue diet food items and scheduled doses of PEG-3350, senna, and magnesium citrate prior to the colonoscopy

DRUGPolyethylene glycol 3350 - electrolyte solution (GoLYTELY)

Split-dose 4 L PEG-3350 electrolyte lavage solution taken the day before and morning of colonoscopy, combined with 24-hour clear liquid diet.

Sponsors

Joseph Spataro
Lead SponsorFED
Happy Colon Foods
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

single-blinded endoscopist

Intervention model description

Feasibility study comparing low-fiber vs clear-liquid diet before colonoscopy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Veterans undergoing index colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, including follow-up colonoscopy after a positive non-invasive stool-based test (e.g., fecal immunochemical test)

Exclusion criteria

* Personal history of colorectal cancer * Inflammatory bowel disease * Prior colon resection * Antithrombotic therapy precluding polypectomy * Pregnancy * Hospitalization at the time of the scheduled procedure * Celiac disease (food kit contained gluten products) * Prior colonoscopy (cognitive bias) * Chronic kidney disease stage 3 or higher * Age 70 years or older.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient acceptance/satisfactionPeriproceduralMeasure: Scores on a designed survey evaluating acceptance, ease of following instructions and willingness to repeat the preparation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of bowel preparationDuring colonoscopy (single procedure)Measure: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score in right, transverse, and left colon; total score 0-9. Adequate bowel preparation defined as total BBPS ≥ 6 with each segment score ≥ 2; proportion of patients achieving adequate prep compared between groups.
Patient-reported symptoms during bowel preparationPeriproceduralPatient-reported symptoms (abdominal pain, cramping, bloating, nausea, vomiting, headaches, weakness, hunger, sleep difficulties) scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = none to 5 = severely distressing).
Adverse events during bowel preparationPeriproceduralProportion of subjects with adverse events, defined as any symptom scored as 5 (severely distressing) on the Likert scale.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 27, 2026