Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid Versus Mandelic Acid Peel in the Treatment of Melasma

Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid Versus Mandelic Acid Peel in the Treatment of Melasma

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07604844
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2026-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melasma

Keywords

Melasma, Tranexamic Acid, Mandelic Acid, Chemical Peel, Hyperpigmentation, MELASQoL, Pakistan

Brief summary

Melasma is a chronic acquired disorder of facial hyperpigmentation that significantly affects quality of life. Both intralesional tranexamic acid and mandelic acid chemical peels are effective treatment options with favorable safety profiles in darker skin types. However, comparative evidence in South Asian populations is limited. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, quality of life outcomes, and patient satisfaction of intralesional tranexamic acid versus mandelic acid peel in patients with facial melasma treated at Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad.

Detailed description

This quasi-experimental, non-randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad. A total of 120 patients aged 18-45 years with clinically diagnosed facial melasma will be enrolled and allocated alternately into two groups. Group A will receive mandelic acid chemical peels every two weeks for six sessions. Group B will receive intradermal tranexamic acid injections every two weeks for six sessions. All participants will receive sunscreen and photoprotection counseling. Outcomes will be assessed using Physician Global Assessment, modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), MELASQoL questionnaire, adverse event monitoring, and patient satisfaction over a 12-week period.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMandelic Acid Peel

After degreasing the face, mandelic acid solution will be applied for 5-7 minutes and then neutralized. Sessions will be repeated every two weeks for six sessions.

PROCEDUREIntralesional Tranexamic Acid

Tranexamic acid will be injected intradermally at 1-cm intervals over melasma patches using a 30-gauge insulin syringe every two weeks for six sessions.

Sponsors

Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessments will be performed by a blinded investigator.

Intervention model description

Participants will be assigned alternately to one of two treatment groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 18-45 years. Clinical diagnosis of facial melasma. Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III-V. Disease duration of at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Pregnancy or lactation. Known hypersensitivity to tranexamic acid or mandelic acid. Active facial dermatoses or infection. Personal or family history of thromboembolic disease. Coagulation disorders. Systemic retinoid use within 6 months. Oral contraceptive or hormone replacement therapy within 6 months. Use of topical or systemic depigmenting agents within 4 weeks. History of keloid tendency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants achieving a Physician Global Assessment rating of good or excellent.12 weeksGood response is defined as ≥51% improvement and excellent response as ≥76% improvement in pigmentation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index(0-24), 0-clear, 24-severeBaseline to 12 weeks
Change in Melasma Quality of Life Scale MELASQoL score(7-70) 10 - 39: Mild quality of life impairment, 40 - 54: Moderate quality of life impairment, 55 - 70: Severe quality of life impairment .Baseline to 12 weeks
Patient satisfaction score (Likert Scale 1-5, 1:Very Dissatisfied, 5: Satisfied)12 weeks
Frequency of treatment-related adverse eventsThroughout the 12-week treatment period

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTShapara Shakeel, MBBS, FCPS-resident derm
shaparashakil@gmail.com+923489081830
CONTACTOvais Faizi, MBBS, FCPS(Internal Medicine)
ovaisfaizi@yahoo.com+923134422922
STUDY_CHAIRAli Amar, MBBS, FCPS(dermatology), CHPE

Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026