Skip to content

Effects of Platelet-Rich Fibrin After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery in Smokers and Nonsmokers

Effects of Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Postoperative Pain, Trismus and Swelling After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery in Smokers and Nonsmokers: A Prospective Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07604584
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2017-05-15
Completion date
2018-12-21
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial Swelling, Impacted Mandibular Third Molar, Postoperative Pain, Trismus

Keywords

Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Mandibular Third Molar, Postoperative Pain, Smoking, Swelling, Trismus

Brief summary

Mandibular third molar surgery is commonly associated with postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been proposed as a biological adjunct to improve postoperative healing; however, its effectiveness in smokers remains unclear. This prospective randomized split-mouth clinical study aimed to evaluate the effects of PRF on postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, and analgesic consumption after impacted mandibular third molar surgery in smokers and nonsmokers. Thirty patients with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were included. PRF was placed in one extraction socket, while the contralateral socket served as the control site. Postoperative clinical outcomes were assessed during the first postoperative week and compared between smoking and nonsmoking patients.

Detailed description

This prospective randomized split-mouth clinical trial was conducted between 2017 and 2019 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, and analgesic consumption after impacted mandibular third molar surgery in smoking and nonsmoking patients. A total of 30 systemically healthy patients aged 18-35 years with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were included. Patients were divided into smoking and nonsmoking groups. In each patient, PRF was randomly applied to one extraction socket, while the contralateral socket served as the control site without PRF application. All surgical procedures were performed by the same oral and maxillofacial surgeon using a standardized surgical protocol. Outcome assessments were performed by a different clinician blinded to the intervention side. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Facial swelling was assessed using linear facial measurements between anatomical landmarks, and trismus was evaluated by measuring maximum interincisal distance. Clinical evaluations were performed preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7. The primary outcome of the study was postoperative pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included postoperative swelling, trismus, and analgesic consumption. The study also aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of PRF between smokers and nonsmokers.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPlatelet-Rich Fibrin

Autologous platelet-rich fibrin prepared from venous blood by centrifugation and placed into the extraction socket after mandibular third molar extraction.

Sponsors

Ankara University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This study was designed as a prospective randomized split-mouth clinical trial in which PRF was applied to one extraction socket, while the contralateral extraction socket served as the control site without PRF application. Bilateral mandibular third molar extractions were performed at least two weeks apart in the same patients. Smoking status was evaluated as a subgroup factor.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy patients aged between 18 and 35 years * Bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars * Mandibular third molars classified as Pell and Gregory Class I, Position C * Mandibular third molars classified as Parant Class II difficulty * Smoking and nonsmoking patients * Patients willing to participate and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of acute infection or pericoronitis * Pregnancy or lactation * Alcohol or substance abuse * Use of oral contraceptives * Menstrual period during surgery * Antibiotic use within the previous month * Smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day * Agitation or inability to cooperate * Incomplete follow-up data * Systemic disease contraindicating oral surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain IntensityPostoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7Postoperative pain intensity assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Facial SwellingPreoperative period and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7Postoperative facial swelling assessed using linear facial measurements between anatomical landmarks.
Postoperative TrismusPreoperative period and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7Trismus assessed by measuring maximum interincisal mouth opening distance.
Postoperative Analgesic ConsumptionPostoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7Number of analgesic tablets used during the postoperative follow-up period.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMehmet Emre Yurttutan, PhD, DDS

Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026