Skip to content

Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Technique in Tennis Elbow

Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Mobilization Among Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07604454
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2025-09-26
Completion date
2026-01-25
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow

Keywords

Tennis Elbow, Lateral Epicondylitis, Muscle Energy Technique, Mulligan Technique, Mobilization With Movement

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) combined with Mulligan Mobilization With Movement (MWM) in patients with lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow). The study compares the combined intervention with Mulligan technique and routine physical therapy alone. Outcomes including pain intensity, functional disability, and quality of life will be assessed using NPRS, PRTEE, and SF-8 questionnaires over a four-week treatment period.

Detailed description

Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain and reduced functional ability affecting the lateral aspect of the elbow. It commonly results from repetitive wrist extension and forearm movements leading to overuse of the extensor tendons. Conservative physiotherapy management including manual therapy and therapeutic exercises is widely used for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Mulligan Mobilization With Movement (MWM) has shown beneficial effects in reducing pain and improving grip strength and functional mobility. Muscle Energy Technique (MET) is another manual therapy approach that may help improve joint mobility, muscle flexibility, and pain reduction through controlled isometric contractions. This study aims to determine whether combining MET with Mulligan technique provides superior clinical outcomes compared to Mulligan technique alone in patients with tennis elbow. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: Experimental Group: MET + MWM + Routine Physical Therapy Control Group: MWM + Routine Physical Therapy Treatment will be provided five sessions per week for four weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after completion of the intervention period.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMuscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Technique

Muscle Energy Technique will be applied using resisted isometric contractions of forearm supination and pronation. Mulligan Mobilization With Movement will be applied using sustained lateral glide during pain-free gripping activity. Treatment sessions will be conducted five times weekly for four weeks.

Mulligan Mobilization With Movement technique will be applied using sustained glide of the forearm while participants perform pain-free gripping activities. Sessions will be conducted five times weekly for four weeks.

Sponsors

University of Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Lahore Hospital (ULH)
CollaboratorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The study is single-blinded. The outcome assessor was blinded to the group allocation and intervention details to minimize assessment bias. Participants and treating physiotherapists were aware of the interventions being administered.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned into two parallel groups. One group will receive Muscle Energy Technique combined with Mulligan Mobilization With Movement and routine physical therapy, while the control group will receive Mulligan Mobilization With Movement with routine physical therapy alone.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 45 years * Both genders * Unilateral lateral epicondylitis * Diagnosed by senior physiotherapist * Pain duration of at least 6 weeks * Pain score ≥7 on NPRS/VAS * Positive symptoms during extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus isometric contraction

Exclusion criteria

* Previous elbow or shoulder surgery * Manual therapy within previous 6 months * History of fracture, dislocation, or tendon tear * Steroid or pain medication use * Peripheral nerve entrapment * Cervical radiculopathy * Osteoporosis or metastasis involving elbow

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Baseline and after 4 weeks of interventionPain intensity will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Disability Measured by PRTEE QuestionnaireBaseline and after 4 weeks of interventionFunctional disability will be assessed using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire.
Quality of Life Measured by SF-8 QuestionnaireBaseline and after 4 weeks of interventionQuality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-8 (SF-8) questionnaire. The SF-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that evaluates physical functioning, general health, pain, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, mental health, and physical role limitations. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026