Skip to content

External Oblique Intercostal Fascial Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia

External Oblique Intercostal Fascial Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Paraumbilical Hernia Repair Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07601945
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2023-05-01
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

External Oblique Intercostal Fascial Plane Block, Pain, Rectus Sheath Block

Keywords

External Oblique Intercostal Fascial Plane Block, Rectus Sheath Block, Pain

Brief summary

This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the external oblique intercostal fascial plane block (EOIPB) versus the rectus sheath block (RSB) for managing postoperative pain following paraumbilical hernioplasty.

Detailed description

Background: Paraumbilical hernia repair is a frequently performed surgical procedure, often associated with significant postoperative pain and delayed recovery, which are major concerns for patients. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the external oblique intercostal fascial plane block (EOIPB) versus the rectus sheath block (RSB) for managing postoperative pain following paraumbilical hernioplasty. Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study enrolled 60 patients, divided into two groups (EOIPB and RSB), each comprising 30 participants. Blocks were administered after general anesthesia and prior to surgery. Patient demographics (age, weight), surgical duration, pain scores (measured by Numeric Rating Scale - NRS), total postoperative morphine consumption, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, and hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure - MAP and heart rate - HR) were assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREExternal Oblique Intercostal Fascial Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia

After the induction of general anesthesia and approximately 15 minutes before the surgical incision, patients were randomly assigned to receive either the EOIPB (Group A) or the RSB (Group B).

Sponsors

Helwan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study enrolled 60 patients, divided into two groups (EOIPB and RSB), each comprising 30 participants

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-65 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II \[16\], and scheduled for elective paraumbilical hernioplasty.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a history of prolonged opioid medication, allergy to local anesthetics, pregnancy, infection at the injection site, and/or coagulopathy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total postoperative morphine consumption in milligrams during the first 24 hours after surgeryFirst 24 hours postoperativelyTotal cumulative morphine requirement administered for postoperative analgesia during the first 24 hours following paraumbilical hernia repair surgery, measured in milligrams (mg).
Number of participants experiencing block-related or postoperative complications within 3 months after surgery3 months after surgeryAssessment of postoperative and block-related complications including local anesthetic toxicity, hematoma, infection, nausea/vomiting, respiratory depression, and other adverse events recorded during the follow-up period.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026