Skip to content

Acute Risk Monitoring for Oncology Therapy Regimen

Acute Risk Monitoring for Oncology Therapy Regimens (ARMOR): A Silent Prospective Validation of a Machine Learning Model

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07601802
Acronym
ARMOR
Enrollment
4740
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2024-03-31
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Acute Care Service Utilization

Keywords

Radiation therapy, Chemoradiation, Acute Care, Chemotherapy, Risk Cancer Care Delivery, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence

Brief summary

Patients undergoing outpatient infusion systemic therapy for cancer are at risk for potentially preventable, unplanned acute care in the form of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. These events impact patient outcomes, treatment decisions, and healthcare costs. To address this need, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services developed the chemotherapy measure (OP-35). Recent randomized controlled studies indicate that electronic health record (EHR)-based machine learning (ML) approaches accurately direct supportive care to reduce acute care during radiotherapy. This study aims to develop and prospectively validate ML approaches to predict the risk of OP-35 qualifying, potentially preventable, acute care events within 30 days of infusion systemic therapy.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Develop and retrospectively validate electronic health record-based machine learning models using routinely collected clinical data from patients receiving systemic therapy to predict risk of potentially preventable OP-35 qualifying acute care events. (Phase 1: Retrospective) II. Prospectively validate machine learning models across distinct time periods. (Phase 2: Prospective) III. Understand patterns of care by stratifying and analyzing model performance by treatment type, cancer diagnosis, and race/ethnicity to assess bias and disparities in outcomes. OUTLINE: Retrospective and prospective clinical data obtained from medical records will be used to develop and validate predictive machine learning models. Prospective data will be divided into 2 phases: Prospective validation (PV) 1 and PV 2.

Interventions

Retrospective chart reviews for data collection will be conducted.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER
Conquer Cancer Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 18 years or older diagnosed with cancer who receive care at UCSF and/or one of the UCSF affiliate locations.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under the age of 18. * Patients receiving care as part of a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for OP-35 prediction model.Up to 6.75 yearsUCSF patients receiving infusion systemic therapy had clinical data incorporated into machine learning (ML) models to predict risk of Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services Chemotherapy Measure (OP-35) qualifying acute care events within 30 days of infusion. Models included variables such as cancer diagnosis, therapeutic agents, and laboratory values. Three ML approaches were employed to train models in predicting OP-35 events. Models were trained and retrospectively validated on data from July 7, 2017, to February 11, 2021, and prospectively validated on 2 cohorts: April 17, 2023, to October 29, 2023 (PV1) and February 19, 2024, to March 31, 2024 (PV2) to generate a validation AUROC. The initial prospective validation occurred over a pre-planned period with the assumption of a 2% event rate, based on the model development data, with an alpha of 0.05 and 84% power to detect an AUROC of 0.75, requiring a sample size of at least 8000 infusions.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJulian Hong, MD, MS

University of California, San Francisco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026