Skip to content

Early vs Standard Ileostomy Reversal

Early Ileostomy Reversal at Two Months Versus Three Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07601594
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
2026-01-15
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Surgery, Ileostomy

Keywords

Ileostomy reversal, Loop ileostomy, Early stoma closure, Colorectal surgery, Stoma closure timing, Anastomotic healing, Postoperative complications

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial compares early (8 weeks) versus standard (12 weeks) ileostomy reversal in patients with confirmed anastomotic healing, evaluating postoperative complications and recovery outcomes.

Detailed description

This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted at Gulab Devi Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, between August 2025 and January 2026 to compare early versus standard timing of ileostomy reversal. Patients aged 14 to 55 years with a protective loop ileostomy following colorectal surgery and radiologically confirmed anastomotic healing were enrolled. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo ileostomy reversal at approximately 8 weeks (early group) or 12 weeks (standard group). The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative complications occurring during the index hospital admission following ileostomy reversal. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, time to first oral intake, time to return to normal activities, patient-reported comfort using a visual analogue scale, and 30-day readmission rates. All procedures were performed using a standardized surgical technique by experienced surgeons within the same unit. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests for continuous and categorical variables, with a significance threshold of p\<0.05. The study aimed to evaluate whether earlier ileostomy reversal is safe and associated with improved recovery outcomes in a resource-limited tertiary care setting.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIleostomy reversal

Surgical closure of loop ileostomy

Sponsors

Gulab Devi Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo ileostomy reversal at 8 weeks (early group) or 12 weeks (standard group), with outcomes compared between the two parallel groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Age 14-55 years Protective loop ileostomy Radiologically confirmed anastomotic healing

Exclusion criteria

* Colorectal malignancy Abdominal tuberculosis Total colectomy Unfit for anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative complication rateFrom enrollment to end of study at 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of hospital stayFrom enrollment to the end of study at 6 months
Time to oral intakeFrom enrollment to the discharge of patient which was upto 2 weeks
Return to normal activitiesFrom enrollment to end of study at 6 months
Patient comfort scoreFrom enrollment to the discharge of patient which was upto 2 weeks

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026