Skip to content

Cyriax Capsular Stretching Technique and Mulligan Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis

Comparative Effects of Cyrixa Capsular Stretching Technique Versus Mulligan Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07601139
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2025-08-27
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis

Keywords

adhesive capsulitis, cyriax techniques

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Mulligan's mobilization versus the Cyriax capsular stretching technique for individuals suffering from adhesive capsulitis. Specifically, the research focuses on determining which approach is more successful in alleviating pain, improving shoulder range of motion (ROM), and reducing functional disability.

Detailed description

This randomized clinical trial, conducted in Gujranwala, involved 30 participants with adhesive capsulitis who were assigned via a lottery method into two equal groups: one receiving Cyriax capsular stretching and the other Mulligan's mobilization. Both cohorts underwent a standard baseline regimen of moist heat, TENS, and therapeutic exercises over a four-week period.

Interventions

along with Baseline Electrotherapeutic treatment, Cyriax Stretching Technique is given to group 1 with 3 sets of 8-10 reps.

OTHERMulligan Mobilization

along with Baseline Electrotherapeutic treatment, Mulligan Mobilization is given to group 1 with 3 sets of 8-10 reps.

Sponsors

Elite College of Management Sciences, Gujranwala, Pakistan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* individuals with age thirty to sixty five years * individuals with more than three months old frozen shoulder

Exclusion criteria

* arthritis of shoulder * trauma * surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric pain rating scale4 weeksit is used to measure pain and a has a scale of 0-10 where 0 means no pain and 10 means worst possible pain
Shoulder pain and disability index4 weeksit is used to measure the impact of shoulder pathology on a patient's life. A higher score indicates greater pain and functional impairment. A score of 0% represents no disability, while 100% represents maximum disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of motion4 weeksGoniometer is used to measure improvement in shoulder range of motion

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORImran Rafiq, PhD Rehabilitation Sciences

Elite College of Management Sciences, Gujranwala

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026