Skip to content

Emotion Intensity Modulates Intention in ASD

Emotional Expression Intensity Modulates Intention Understanding in Children With ASD: Evidence From Eye Tracking and Hidden Markov Modeling

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07597655
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-05-19
Start date
2025-12-15
Completion date
2026-03-27
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Intellectual Disability

Keywords

emotional expression intensity, eye tracking, hidden Markov modeling (HMM), social cognition

Brief summary

This study used eye-tracking to examine how emotional expression intensity (low/medium/high) influences intention understanding in children with ASD, PDD, and TD during a puzzle-search task.

Detailed description

This study examined how emotional expression intensity influences children's intention understanding during a puzzle-search task. Children with ASD, PDD, and typical development (TD) watched videos in which a model searched for a missing puzzle piece under three levels of emotional expression intensity: low, medium, and high. Eye-tracking measures were used to assess both the outcome and the dynamic process of intention understanding.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Typically developing children without any developmental or neurological disorders. Confirmed clinical diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and reconfirmed by the criteria of the Diagnostic Observation Table for ASD, Second Edition (ADOS-2). Confirmed clinical diagnosis of Intellectual Disability and the ADOS-2 with a comparison score below the ASD diagnostic cut-off score (comparison score≤2).

Exclusion criteria

\- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision, no color vision deficiencies, and legal guardian provided written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The visitation rate of the AOIFrom second 3 to second 30 of the experimental stimulus.Number of times the gaze enters the AOI per unit time. It measures how frequently the AOI is re-visited. Higher rates indicate repeated returns, reflecting high interest or difficulty disengaging; lower rates suggest rare or brief attention.
The proportions of fixation durationDuring the full 40 seconds video presentation.fixation duration on an AOI ÷ total fixation duration (or across multiple AOIs). It measures the relative amount of attention allocated to a specific area. Higher proportions indicate prioritized or deeper processing of that region.
The first fixation latencyDuring the full 40 seconds video presentation.The First Fixation Latency = time from TOI onset until the first fixation lands on a predefined object. It measures how fast attention is initially drawn to that object. Shorter latencies indicate higher salience or more efficient search.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The face fixation transition ratioFrom second 13 to second 15 of the experimental stimulus.Number of gaze transitions from any non-face AOI to a face ÷ total number of gaze transitions. It measures how often attention shifts toward faces. Higher ratios indicate stronger social orienting or difficulty disengaging from faces.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 20, 2026