Skip to content

Injectable Alloplastic Bone Graft for Socket Preservation: Clinical, Radiographic, and Histological Evaluation

Clinical, Radiographic, and Histological Evaluation of Injectable Alloplastic Bone Graft in Extraction Socket Preservation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07595445
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-05-19
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Socket Preservation, Tooth Extraction

Keywords

Injectable Alloplastic Bone Graft, Socket Preservation, Bone Regeneration, Clinical Evaluation, Radiographic Evaluation, Histological Evaluation

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the clinical efficacy of injectable alloplastic bone grafts in terms of radiography and histology in order to preserve tooth sockets following extraction. Methodology: Twenty new extraction sockets from twenty surgically extracted non-restorable mandibular molar teeth will be used in this clinical investigation.

Detailed description

Using computer randomization (http://www.randomlists.com), the 20 extraction sockets will be split into two equal groups (n=10) at random. Ten sockets (the experimental group) will undergo socket preservation using injectable bone substitute biomaterial. To permit normal physiological healing, the remaining 10 sockets (control group) will left unfilled. Clinical examination will be carried out after 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 4 months, while after 4 months, radiographic measurements of bone dimension changes were carried out, and the histological inspection will be carried out three months after the removal of the tooth.

Interventions

PROCEDUREInjectable Alloplastic Bone

Ten extraction sockets will undergo socket preservation using injectable bone substitute biomaterial following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket curettage.

PROCEDUREnatural healing (no graft)

Ten extraction sockets will be left unfilled after atraumatic extraction to allow normal physiological healing.

Sponsors

Suez Canal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient aged between 40 and 60 years. * General good health. * Presence of a hopeless mandibular posterior tooth that requires extraction. * Volunteer subjects have to voluntarily sign an informed consent. * Patient Indicated for implant.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with systemic disease affection bone metabolism. * Large periapical radiographic changes related to the tooth to be Extracted, in the form of abscess, granuloma, or cyst. * Teeth need trans-alveolar extraction. * Patients with contraindication to surgical treatment. * Patients suffering from a psychological disorder. * Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in buccolingual ridge width assessed by CBCTBaseline and 4 monthsBuccolingual ridge width will be measured radiographically using CBCT immediately post-extraction (baseline) and after 4 months
Bone density assessed by CBCTBaseline and 4 monthsBone density of the extraction socket will be evaluated radiographically using CBCT gray values immediately post-extraction (baseline) and after 4 months.
Percentage of newly formed bone assessed histomorphometrically3 monthsThe percentage of newly formed bone will be evaluated histomorphometrically using hematoxylin and eosin staining during implant placement.
Percentage of residual graft material3 monthsResidual graft material percentage will be assessed histomorphometrically using hematoxylin and eosin staining during implant placement.
Percentage of connective tissue3 monthsConnective tissue percentage will be assessed histomorphometrically using hematoxylin and eosin staining during implant placement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mucosal healingUp to 4 monthsClinical mucosal healing will be assessed by the presence or absence of infection, swelling, and adverse tissue reaction during follow-up visits.

Contacts

CONTACTMoataz Selmi
moatazselmi93@gmail.com01006848382
STUDY_DIRECTORdr mohamed elsholkamy el sholkamy, Professor

Suez Canal University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORmoataz mohsen zaki, master

Suez Canal University

STUDY_DIRECTORDr merihan nabih elmansy

Suez Canal University

STUDY_DIRECTORdr ahmed abdelmohsen younis

Suez Canal University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 20, 2026