Skip to content

Propionic Acid for Multiple Sclerosis: Safety and Benefits

Propionic Acid in Multiple Sclerosis: Safety, Tolerability and Clinical Outcomes From the Pro-MADAI Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07595081
Acronym
Pro-MADAI
Enrollment
22
Registered
2026-05-19
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2025-12-12
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis, Propionic Acid, Drug Safety, Cognitive Performance, Disability

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the long-term safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of propionic acid as an add-on therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, open-label extension of the placebo-controlled MADAI trial, including 22 patients with stable relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Participants received oral PA (500 mg twice daily) for an additional 9 months follow-up (FU). Multimodal assessments included cognitive testing (SDMT), physical performance (9HPT, 10mWT), patient-reported outcome measurements PROMs (SF-36, FSMC, ESS, BDI-II), and serum NfL analysis.

Interventions

Patients will receive propionic acid as add on MS treatment.

Sponsors

Salzburger Landeskliniken
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) * Clinically and radiologically stable MS in the previous 3 months * Age between 18 and 70 years * Positive finding for oligoclonal bands (OCBs) * Written consent * Blood collection at the beginning and end of the study for routine parameter examination as well as sample preservation (especially for measuring propionic acid levels) * Negative pregnancy test for female participants of childbearing age

Exclusion criteria

* History of ongoing propionic acid (PA) supplementation exceeding 3 months * Positive JC virus titer during natalizumab treatment * Presence of severe active systemic disease * Presence of acute neurological conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum neurofilament light chain (NfL)9 monthsassessed as pg/ml

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)9 monthsMeasuring cognitive processing speed in patients with MS. Participants are instructed to match symbols to their respective numbers using a reference key. The final score is determined by the number of correct symbol-number pairings completed within 90 seconds. Higher scores indicate better cognitive abilities.
Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT)9 monthsInstrument to evaluate fine motor skills of the upper limbs and manual dexterity. Performance is quantified by completion time, with shorter times reflecting better manual dexterity. The participants insert and remove nine small pegs individually into nine corresponding holes on a rectangular board. To improve reliability, this process was repeated twice for each hand.
10-Meter Walk Test (10mWT)9 monthsEvaluation of lower extremity function. Participants were instructed to walk in a straight line at their fastest comfortable pace without running. To avoid measurement bias caused by acceleration and deceleration phases, timing was restricted to the interval between the 2- and 8-meter marks, calculating walking speed over a 6-meter distance.
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)9 monthsThe SF-36 covers eight subscales: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). These are transformed into two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Both scores are calculated by combining the subscales using specific algorithms. They reflect the overall physical and mental health status, respectively. Each SF-36 domain is scored individually and transformed to a 0-100 scale, where 0 indicates poor health, and 100 represents optimal health. Scores are interpreted as follows: excellent (\>60), above average (51-60), average to slightly below average (41-50), moderately below average (31-40), and significant impairment (\<30).
Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC)9 monthsFatigue was assessed using the 20-item Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC). Motor (FSMCmot) and cognitive (FSMCcog) aspects of fatigue were evaluated separately, and a total score (FSMCtot) was calculated. This score ranges from 20 to 100. Fatigue severity was classified as mild (≥43), moderate (≥53), or severe (≥63).
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)9 monthsDaytime sleepiness was evaluated using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), an 8-item self-report questionnaire. The ESS assesses the propensity to fall asleep or doze off briefly in different daily situations. Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness. Each Item describes a hypothetical scenario, which participants rate on a 4-point scale (0-3). This results in a total score ranging from 0 to 24 points. Excessive daytime sleepiness was classified as mild (\>10), moderate (\>13), or severe (\>16).
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)9 monthsDepressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II), a 21-item questionnaire. It evaluates various aspects of depression, including libido, fatigue, appetite, decision-making ability, and feelings of guilt. For each item, participants were asked to select one of four statements assessing symptom severity from absent (0) to severe (3).

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 20, 2026