Skip to content

Comparing the Effects of Macquarie Injury Management Group Protocol and Targeted Knee Exercise Program on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis

Comparative Effects of Macquarie Injury Management Group Protocol and Targeted Knee Exercise Program on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07593599
Enrollment
84
Registered
2026-05-18
Start date
2025-04-28
Completion date
2026-05-04
Last updated
2026-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Knee joint, Pain

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the macquire injury management group protocol and targeted knee exercise program works to treat knee osteoarthritis grade 2.This clinical trial compares the effects of macquire injury management group protocol and targeted knee exercise program on pain and range of motion and functional disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis grade 2.Adults with knee osteoarthritis grade 2 were included in this study. A total of 84 participants were divided into two groups with 42 patients in each group. One group received macquire injury management group protocol and the other group received targeted knee exercise program. Pain was assessed using the numeric pain rating scale and functional disability was measured using WOMAC index. Range of motion was also evaluated before and after treatment by universal goniometer.

Detailed description

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most prevalent type of arthritis, is the foremost cause of disability. Knee OA mainly affects the synovial membrane, bones, and cartilage of the joint. The synovial membrane is a smooth lining that protects the joint. Conservative management through manual therapy is widely used, but comparative effectiveness of different techniques remains unclear. This randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the effects of macquire injury management group protocol and targeted knee exercise program on pain and range of motion and functional disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis grade 2.A total of 84 participants diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis grade 2 were recruited . All the screened and willing participants were randomly allocated to two groups by lottery method with 42 patients in each group. (Group A: Experimental group /MIMG group, Group B: Comparative Group / CK group) .Group A received macquire injury management group protocol . The MIMG Knee Protocol is known for its emphasis on soft tissue mobilization. The patients were made to lie down in a supine position and their knee joints were in an extended position during the treatment. In order to perform the soft tissue mobilization, the physiotherapist gently worked on the soft tissues of the knee joint for about two to three minutes using both his hands. In addition to the manual treatment method, the patients also underwent 45 minutes of physical therapy exercises . Group B received targeted knee exercise program , was aimed at improving the strength, proprioception, and stability of the knee joint. It comprised of progressively increasing knee exercises for the quadriceps (for example, straight leg raises and terminal knee extensions), hip abductors, and hamstrings. In addition to these exercises, there were also exercises to increase the stability of the joint by means of proprioceptive exercises involving single leg standing and dynamic stability exercises. Functional exercises including sit-to-stand and step up were also included. The intervention period lasted for 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Pain was assessed using the numeric pain rating scale and functional disability was measured using WOMAC index. Range of motion was also evaluated before and after treatment by universal goniometer. The primary objective of this study is To determine the effects of Macquire Injury Management Group protocol and Targeted Knee Exercise Program on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients with Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis. The findings will help clinicians select the most effective manual therapy approach for managing Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMacquire injury management group protocol

The patients were made to lie down in a supine position and their knee joints were in an extended position during the treatment. In order to perform the soft tissue mobilization, the physiotherapist gently worked on the soft tissues of the knee joint for about two to three minutes using both his hands. In addition to the manual treatment method, the patients also underwent 45 minutes of physical therapy exercises

PROCEDURETargeted knee exercise program

It comprised of progressively increasing knee exercises for the quadriceps (for example, straight leg raises and terminal knee extensions), hip abductors, and hamstrings. In addition to these exercises, there were also exercises to increase the stability of the joint by means of proprioceptive exercises involving single leg standing and dynamic stability exercises. Functional exercises including sit-to-stand and step up were also included. The intervention period lasted for 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week.

Sponsors

Green International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is a randomized, parallel-group interventional study. Participants with Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms. Group A received macquire injury management group protocol and Group B received targeted knee exercise program. Both interventions were administered for the specifiec treatment period to compare their effectiveness on pain reduction and improvement in knee range of motion and functional disability.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Both female and male subjects aged between 40 to 60 year 2. Diagnosed knee osteoarthritis, Grade II by Kellegren Lawrence.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any surgical procedure done for lower extremity 2. Any infection 3. Post traumatic knee stiffness 4. Secondary knee osteoarthritis 5. Peripheral vascular disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain by numeric pain rating scaleBaseline , 6th week and 12th week post interventionThe level of pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), which is a simple and widely used tool for evaluating pain intensity. In this scale, individuals are asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. Based on the categorization by Fiddiyanti et al. (2024), pain scores ranging from 1-3 are considered mild pain, 4-6 indicate moderate pain, and 7-10 represent severe pain. This scale provides a quick and reliable measure of a person's subjective pain experience.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of motion by universal goniometerBaseline, 6th week and 12th week post intervention.Range of motion was measured by Universal goniometer (UG) is commonly used as a standard method to evaluate Range of motion (ROM) as part of joint motions.
Functional disability by WOMAC indexBaseline, 6th week and 12th week post intervention.Functional disability was measured by WOMAC index, is a scale consisting of 24 items in 3 domains. Pain- 5 items, Stiffness -2 items, Physical function- 17 items. Total score ranges from 0 to 96. Each item is scored 0(none), 1(mild), 2(moderate), 3(severe) and 4(extreme). Average of the score is obtained by dividing the total score with 96 and multiplying with 100.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 19, 2026