Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to provide evidence on the optimal timing and efficacy of lacrimal probing in infants with congenital NLDO to minimize morbidity and healthcare costs .
Detailed description
Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) manifests with symptoms such as excessive tearing, lash crusting, and mucopurulent secretions. A significant cohort study revealed that CNLDO affects one in nine newborns, highighting its public health significance 1. Controversies per-sist regarding the most appropriate time and type of intervention for managing CNLDO2 . Standard early management typically includes hydrostatic lacrimal sac massage combined with topical antibiotics. Many ophthalmologists believe that a majority of obstructions resolve spontaneously with massage; however, around 25% of children may require additional intervention such as probing 3. Currently, there is no established consensus on the optimal timing for intervention in theses cases. Because of the possibility of spontaneous resolution, some authors recommend postponing probing until after one year of age . Conversely, other studies suggest that delaying probing beyond six months may increase the risk of inflammation and fibrosis, potentially lowering the success rates of later interventions 4. Aim of the study This study aims to provide evidence on the optimal timing and efficacy of lacrimal probing in infants with congenital NLDO to minimize morbidity and healthcare costs .
Interventions
nasolacrimal duct probing
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
double blind
Intervention model description
randomized clinical trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients with simple congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Exclusion criteria
* patients with complicated nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| epiphora stop evaluated by Munk scale and TEARS scale | 3 months | Munk Scale, which ranges from 0 (no tearing) to 5 (constant tearing) based on daily wiping frequency. TEARS Scale, which measures four subscales: Times of wiping, Effects (clinical), Activity limitations, and Reflex tearing. |
Contacts
Sohag University