Food Allergy in Children, Food Allergy Peanut
Conditions
Keywords
food allergy, peanut allergy, oral immunotherapy
Brief summary
While rigorous clinical trials have established peanut OIT as a promising therapy capable of inducing desensitization and even remission, its transition to routine clinical practice requires robust real-world evidence. Current management relies on strict avoidance, and the lack of reliable biomarkers to predict long-term success remains a significant barrier to the wider, more accessible application of OIT. Therefore, there is a critical need to evaluate peanut OIT in pragmatic, real-world settings. Such studies are essential to understand its effectiveness and safety beyond controlled trial conditions, to identify which patients benefit most, and to develop practical monitoring strategies. Generating this evidence is a crucial step toward making this treatment a viable and optimized option for the growing global population affected by peanut allergy.
Detailed description
This is an open-label, non-randomized, two-arm trial designed to evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a pragmatic peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocol for children under 18 in Hong Kong. The study addresses a significant unmet need by providing access to a treatment available overseas and aims to establish a translatable model for future food allergy treatments in the region. The intervention arm (n=100) will undergo 18 months of peanut OIT, while the control arm (n=25) will follow standard care, i.e., strict peanut avoidance for the same duration. Eligible children aged 2-17 with a confirmed peanut allergy will be recruited from the Specialist Outpatient Clinic at the Prince of Wales Hospital and through referral from other public hospitals. Participants will be allocated to the active or control arm in a 4:1 ratio. The primary efficacy measure is the proportion of participants in the OIT group versus the control group who achieve a desensitization level of more than 640 mg of peanut protein, as confirmed by an oral food challenge at the end of the 18-month treatment period. Some of the key secondary objectives include to systematically document the frequency and severity of treatment-related adverse events and the proportion of participants discontinuing OIT due to these events; and to identify distinct pre- and post-treatment plasma protein biomarkers associated with successful OIT.
Interventions
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPeanut Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)
This study uses a commercially available, standardized defatted peanut powder as its active intervention
Sponsors
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
This study employs a prospective, open-label, non-randomized, two-arm parallel-group design to evaluate peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) in a real-world Hong Kong pediatric population. Ninety participants will be allocated in a 4:1 ratio to either an 18-month pragmatic OIT protocol (n=100) or a standard care control group maintaining strict avoidance (n=25). As a pragmatic trial, it focuses on effectiveness and safety under routine clinical conditions rather than ideal settings. The open-label design reflects the interventional nature of the treatment, where blinding is not feasible. This model aims to generate crucial local evidence on protocol feasibility, tolerability, and clinical outcomes to inform future regional allergy care strategies.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Subject's parent and/ or guardian must be able to understand and provide informed consent. * Age 2 to 17 years of age * Either sex * Any race, any ethnicity * Have a history of sensitization \[positive skin prick test to peanut extract as defined by wheal size at least 3mm above control OR peanut-specific IgE ≥0.35 kUA/L\]
Exclusion criteria
Individuals who meet any of these criteria are not eligible for enrolment: * Any disorder in which adrenaline is contraindicated (such as hypertension or cardiac rhythm disorders) * History of chronic diseases requiring therapy (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis) * Past or current major illness that in the opinion of the Site investigator may affect the subject's ability to participate in the study e.g. increased risk to the participant * Concurrent treatment with any allergen immunotherapy * Participation in any trials of therapeutic interventions for FA, or therapy with anti-IgE or other biologics within 1 year of enrolment * Current uncontrolled or moderate to severe asthma as defined by FEV1 value \<80% predicted for participants aged 7 years or older and are able to perform spirometry * Gastrointestinal eosinophilic disorders * Use of short-acting antihistamine (e.g. chlorpheniramine) within 3 days prior to open-labelled food challenge or skin testing, or medium-acting antihistamine (e.g. cetirizine, loratadine) within 5 days prior to open-labelled food challenge or skin testing * Use of beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers or calcium channel blockers
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Desensitization Rate at EOT | EOT (18 months) | Proportion of participants with a peanut eliciting dose \>640 mg protein at end-of-treatment (EOT) in OIT vs control groups. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Safety During Treatment | Baseline to EOT (18 months) | Exposure-adjusted incidence rate and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in active vs control group |
Countries
Hong Kong
Contacts
CONTACTSze Yin Agnes Leung, MBChB
Outcome results
None listed