Skip to content

A Research Comparing Efficacy of PIEB Plus PCEA vs CEI Plus PCEA for Labour Analgesia

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) Plus Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion (CEI) Plus Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) for Labour Analgesia

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07592364
Enrollment
88
Registered
2026-05-18
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnant Women, Labour Analgesia

Keywords

Parturient, Pregnant, PIEB, PCEA, CEI, Labour Analgesia

Brief summary

During labour process, one of the most effective ways to manage pain is via epidural analgesia. It is commonly and widely use for all pregnant women underwent labour process. It provides good pain relief during labour process especially for contraction pain and pain during descending of baby during delivery. During epidural insertion, a small catheter (which is flexible and thin) will be inserted via epidural needle at the back. Using this epidural catheter, pain medication will be given to ease and help controlling the pain. This procedure is usually done after you have been admitted to labour room. In this research, investigator will compare among two different method of epidural administration which are: \- Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus with Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PIEB + PCEA): * This method will enable the medication to be served automatically within the set time through the epidural catheter and allows for participants to manage additional boluses of medication according to the participants pain level. \- Continuous Epidural Infusion with Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (CEI + PCEA): * This method will deliver continuous infusion of medication and allows for participants to manage additional boluses of medication according to the participants pain level. Investigator want to determine the best method between this two in order to have better pain control, less usage of medication and improving the satisfaction of patient. In participating this research, the participants will help us in understanding the best method to be use for the labour process in which eventually help other future patient who is in need.

Interventions

Programmed intermitted epidural bolus plus patient controlled epidural analgesia with drug and concentration of ropivacaine 0.05% plus fentanyl 2mcg/ml. Patient will received hourly bolus of 10mls and patient controlled 10mls of bolus

Continuous epidural infusion plus patient controlled epidural analgesia with drug and concentration of ropivacaine 0.05% plus fentanyl 2mcg/ml. Patient will received 10mls/hr infusion plus patient controlled of 10mls per bolus

Sponsors

Aiman Bin Ab Adzim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All pregnant female \> 36 weeks of gestation * Age 18 years old and above * ASA I and II * Consented for study

Exclusion criteria

* Allergies to LA and opioids * Severe systemic and mental disease * Contraindication to regional analgesia * Hemodynamic instabilities * Systemic coagulopathies * Treatment with anticoagulants * Severe obstetric complications - eg. eclampsia, placenta previae * Patient refusal * Failed epidural insertion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
compare the effectiveness of PIEB plus PCEA versus CEI plus PCEA in labour analgesia via VAS score, total LA consumption and maternal satisfactionFrom enrollment to the removal of epidural catheterVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) score with 0 for no pain and 10 for worst possible pain
compare the effectiveness of PIEB plus PCEA versus CEI plus PCEA in labour analgesia via total LA consumptionFrom enrollment to the removal of epidural cathetertotal Local Anaesthesia (LA) consumption related to the total amount which is used throughout the procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
compare the incidence of breakthrough pain requiring clinician bolus in PIEB plus PCEA versus CEI plus PCEAFrom epidural catheter insertion until removal of epidural cathetercomparing number of breakthrough pain which requires intervention by the clinician to give rescue bolus in between each group
compare the incidence of motor blocked in PIEB plus PCEA versus CEI plus PCEAafter epidural catheter insertion until the removal of epidural cathetercomparing if there is any occurence of motor blockade in anytime during the study period by modified bromage scale

Countries

Malaysia

Contacts

CONTACTAiman Ab Adzim
aimanadzim1224@gmail.com+60132750766
CONTACTNik Rowina Nik Mohammed
nikrowina@upm.edu.my+60199415676

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 19, 2026