Skip to content

To Evaluate the Preliminary Efficacy of Our Digitally Enhanced CHW-led Intervention in Newly Diagnosed PDAC

To Evaluate the Preliminary Efficacy of Our Digitally Enhanced CHW-led Intervention in Newly Diagnosed PDAC With a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of 60 PDAC Patients and Their Caregivers Comparing the Intervention to Attention Control With Usual Care.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07591571
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-05-15
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2026-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer, Adult

Keywords

community health worker, pancreatic cancer, palliative care

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a community health worker led intervention that helps facilitate palliative care works to treat newly-diagnostic pancreatic cancer. It will also help understand the impact of this intervention on people who are caregivers for patients with pancreatic cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the community health worker improve symptoms and quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer? Does the community health worker improve the burden of caregiving and quality of life in family caregivers? Researchers will compare drug ABC to a control (where patients get the care that patients with pancreatic cancer receive including access to handouts and videos that the investigators provide patients by national organizations) to see if the intervention works to help patients with pancreatic cancer. Participants will: Meet with study staff several times over 3 months and complete surveys about their experience and symptoms Patients assigned with the community health worker will meet with them in person or video.

Detailed description

d. Overall study design This will be a pilot randomized controlled trial where the investigators will plan on randomizing patients with PDAC in a 1:1 fashion to receive a digitally-enhanced community health worker intervention that will involve visits with the CHW and digital communication to facilitate care navigation and provide early palliative care engagement or usual care. e. Study Procedures and Schedule Recruitment of subjects for the study To recruit patients for the interviews, the investigators will screen all of the patients who present for endoscopic ultrasound (with biopsy) to the endoscopy unit or pre-procedure clinic at Loma Linda, as well as patients referred to the medical or surgical oncology clinics with a new diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The investigators will recruit patients from our gastroenterology clinic and endoscopic unit and the oncology clinic (the researcher's patients) both in person and over the phone via a telephone call. The investigators will not contact patients outside our clinical practice but will distribute an IRB-approved flyer with our number to oncology clinics that patients can call and leave a voicemail or email us at our secure HIPPA-complaint Loma Linda email address assigned to our study (cancerresearch@llu.edu). The investigators will also distribute an IRB-approved letter to other oncologists informing them of the study so they can distribute the flyer to their patients and inform patients who may be candidates for this study. The reason the investigators are including patients with suspected PDAC is to eliminate delays once they receive a diagnosis as patients previously reported a flurry of medical visits in the 2 weeks after diagnosis. However, patients will need to undergo a biopsy and have pathology confirmation before study initiation. Patients found to have other pathology on biopsy than pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be excluded. The investigators will explain the study inperson or over the phone when they are referred for a pancreatic biopsy or for oncologic care for a new diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The investigators will explain that the investigators are recruiting them because they have pancreatic cancer and want to study if a community health worker can help patients like themselves navigate care and engage with palliative care better than the current care that patients receive. If they are interested, they will then be consented using written informed consent at their clinic visit in the clinic or prior to their in-person study visit. When a patient is diagnosed with PDAC, they receive the diagnosis over the phone and follow-up in clinic. They are referred to medical and surgical oncology and to palliative care for supportive care..

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPAL-CHW-PDAC

The intervention involves meeting with a community health worker who will address quality of life concerns, including physical, spiritual, social, and psychological concerns, help patients schedule visits, and set them up to receive telehealth. They also monitor their symptoms via weekly text messages and receive help managing them. Finally, they help patients complete advanced care planning.

This involves usual care at our institution, including referrals to medical oncology, surgical oncology, and palliative care but they also receive attention from the study coordinator completing 3 visits including survey instruments and are provided standard of care written and media-based materials from PANCAN and the National Pancreas Foundation.

Sponsors

Loma Linda University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 90 * English or Spanish-Speaking * Diagnosed with Newly-Diagnosed Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma or has a pancreatic mass on CT/MRI with suspected PDAC and is awaiting biopsy. * Able to communicate verbally to allow for audio recording to complete an exit interview * Must be able to consent

Exclusion criteria

• Biopsy Does not Confirm Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Symptom Index12 weeksThis score goes from 0 to 72 with higher scores being better. It measures the symptom burden in pateints with pancreatic, biliary and liver cancers.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary12 weeksThe FACT-Hep score measures quality of life in patients with pancreatic, biliary and liver cancers. The total score ranges from 0 to 180, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Preparedness for Caregiving Scale12 weeksThe score ranges from 0 to 5 and represents the mean of 8 questions. A higher score is better. It is designed to capture caregiver preparedness.
City of Hope Caregiver QoL Instrument12 weeksThis instrument score represents a mean of subscores and ranges from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating better caregiver QoL
Goal Concordant Care12 weeksThis outcome will not be determined quantitatively but rather qualitatively by conducting interviews with the patient and caregiver (only the caregiver if the patient dies prior to 12 weeks). Thematic analyses will be peformed with the goal of identifying if the patient and caregiver feel that the care they received reflected their treatment goals.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer for Patients12 weeksThis measures psychological distress in pateints and scores from 0 to 10, with a lower score being better, i.e., representing lower levels of psychological distress.
National Comprehensive Cancer Center Distress Thermometer for Caregivers12 weeksThis measures psychological distress in caregivers and yields scores from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower levels of psychological distress.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTNikhil Thiruvengadam, MD
nthiruvengadam@llu.edu9095584668

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 24, 2026