Muscle Strength Development, Muscle Strength, Neuromuscular Function
Conditions
Keywords
PNF stretching, Static stretching, Hamstring quadriceps ratio, Isokinetic strength, Acute effect
Brief summary
This study aimed to compare the acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and static stretching on hamstring-to-quadriceps (H/Q) strength ratios in healthy young men. A randomized crossover design was used in which participants completed both stretching protocols on separate days. Isokinetic muscle strength and H/Q ratios were assessed following each intervention. The findings provide insight into the immediate effects of different stretching modalities on muscle balance and performance.
Detailed description
The present study investigated the acute effects of two commonly used stretching modalities-proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and static stretching-on isokinetic muscle strength and hamstring-to-quadriceps (H/Q) ratios in physically active healthy young males. The study employed a randomized crossover design with repeated measures, allowing each participant to complete both experimental conditions under standardized laboratory settings. Participants attended three sessions: a familiarization session followed by two experimental sessions separated by at least 48 hours. Each experimental session included a standardized warm-up, followed by either PNF or static stretching intervention, and subsequent isokinetic strength testing. Peak torque values for quadriceps (concentric) and hamstrings (concentric and eccentric) were measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/s. Traditional and functional H/Q ratios were calculated. The primary aim was to determine whether these stretching modalities produce acute alterations in muscle strength and H/Q ratios. The study also examined whether the type of ratio (traditional vs. functional) significantly influences outcomes. Findings contribute to understanding the neuromuscular implications of stretching in warm-up protocols.
Interventions
OTHERPNF Stretching
Participants performed four repetitions of PNF stretching consisting of a 6-second isometric hamstring contraction at approximately 60% of maximal voluntary contraction followed by a 30-second passive stretch. Rest intervals were standardized.
OTHERStatic Stretching
Participants performed four repetitions of static hamstring stretching, each lasting 30 seconds, with 30-second rest intervals between repetitions.
Sponsors
Gümüşhane Universıty
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Crossover Assignment
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age between 18 - 25 years, healthy male individuals * Physically active (≥3 days/week, ≥30 min/day)
Exclusion criteria
* Musculoskeletal injury in the last 6 months * Any neurological or orthopedic disorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hamstring-to-Quadriceps (H/Q) Ratio | Immediately after intervention | Both traditional (Hcon/Qcon) and functional (Hecc/Qcon) ratios were calculated using isokinetic peak torque values. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quadriceps Concentric Peak Torque | Immediately post-intervention | Quadriceps Concentric Peak Torque |
| Hamstring Concentric Peak Torque | Immediately post-intervention | Hamstring Concentric Peak Torque |
| Hamstring Eccentric Peak Torque | Immediately post-intervention | Hamstring Eccentric Peak Torque |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed