Skip to content

Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones

Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07589153
Enrollment
110
Registered
2026-05-15
Start date
2012-05-01
Completion date
2013-11-01
Last updated
2026-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Calculi Nephrolithiasis Urolithiasis Renal Stone

Keywords

Kidney Calculi Nephrolithiasis Urolithiasis Renal Stone

Brief summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for renal stones measuring 10-20 mm. The study specifically investigates whether the anatomical location of the stone (upper, middle, or lower calyx) influences the success rates and stone-free outcomes of these two surgical modalities. A total of 110 patients were randomized into two equal groups to evaluate primary endpoints, including stone-free rates at the 3-month follow-up, and secondary endpoints such as operative time and complication rates

Detailed description

n this prospective randomized controlled trial, 110 adult patients diagnosed with a single non-staghorn renal stone measuring 10-20 mm were enrolled. The study was conducted at Kırıkkale High Specialization Hospital between the specified study dates. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two treatment arms: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS). Randomization was implemented using a computer-generated sequence to ensure unbiased allocation. The primary objective is to compare the stone-free rates (SFR) between the two surgical techniques at the 3-month postoperative mark, as confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography. A secondary and key focus of the study is the impact of stone localization (upper, middle, and lower calyx) on the success of each procedure. Additional outcomes evaluated include total operative time, hospital stay duration, hemoglobin level changes, and postoperative complication rates according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The results aim to provide a location-based surgical selection framework for mid-sized renal stones.

Interventions

DEVICEPercutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

A standard percutaneous approach was used. Under general anesthesia, a nephrostomy tract was established, and the stone was fragmented using a pneumatic or ultrasonic lithotripter.

The procedure was performed using a flexible ureterorenoscope. Stones were fragmented using a Holmium:YAG laser fiber after reaching the renal pelvis and calyces retrogradely.

Sponsors

Kırıkkale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 18 years or older. Presence of a single, non-staghorn radiopaque renal stone measuring 10-20 mm in diameter. Stone location in the upper, middle, or lower renal calyx. Patients who provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with untreated urinary tract infections or urosepsis. Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders or receiving anticoagulant therapy. Presence of severe skeletal deformities preventing surgical positioning. Patients with morbid obesity (BMI \> 40 kg/m²). Presence of anatomical abnormalities (e.g., horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney). Pregnancy. Multiple renal stones or stones larger than 20 mm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone-Free Rate (SFR)3 months postoperativelyThe percentage of patients who are completely free of stones or have only clinically insignificant residual fragments (less than 3 mm). This will be evaluated using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Operative DurationDuring the surgical procedure (intraoperative)The time from the initial incision or insertion of the endoscope until the completion of the procedure and dressing, measured in minutes
Change in Hemoglobin LevelsWithin 24 hours postoperatively.The difference between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels to assess blood loss.
Postoperative ComplicationsFrom surgery up to 30 days postoperatively.The frequency and severity of complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system
Length of Hospital StayFrom the day of surgery until hospital discharge (typically 1-3 days).The total number of days the patient remained in the hospital following the procedure.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 16, 2026