Skip to content

Comparative Assessment of Primary Stability by Osseodensification Using Densah Burs Conventional Drilling Methods.

Comparative Assessment of Primary Stability by Osseodensification Using Densah Burs Conventional Drilling Methods.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07586475
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-05-14
Start date
2026-12-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient With Low Denisty Bone

Keywords

dental impant, primary stability, ossseodensfication, densah burs, conventional osteotomy

Brief summary

This clinical study evaluates and compares the primary stability of dental implants placed using osseodensification with Densah burs versus conventional drilling methods. The goal is to determine whether osseodensification improves implant stability and bone density, especially in areas with low bone quality

Interventions

PROCEDUREosseodensification using densah burs

Participants will be divided into two groups. The first group will undergo implant site preparation using the osseodensification technique with Densah burs, which compacts bone and enhances primary stability without removing bone. The second group will undergo conventional drilling, where bone is removed in a stepwise manner to prepare the implant site according to standard surgical protocols."

PROCEDUREconvetional Driiling technique

"This group will receive implant site preparation using the conventional drilling technique, where bone is gradually removed to create space for the implant, as per standard implantology protocols."

Sponsors

Suez Canal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patients * Patients requiring dental implant placement in areas with varying bone quality * Patients without systemic diseases that interfere with bone healing or implant success (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or osteoporosis)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with systemic diseases affecting bone metabolism * Presence of large periapical radiographic lesions related to the tooth to be extracted (abscess, granuloma, or cyst) * Teeth requiring transalveolar extraction * Patients with contraindications to surgical treatment * Patients with psychological disorders * Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Implant Stability Measured by Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) Using the Osstell DeviceImmediately after implant placement (within minutes)Description: Primary implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement using the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) obtained from the Osstell device. The ISQ scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater implant stability.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026