Skip to content

Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Spasticity, Quadriceps Muscle Strength and Functional Mobility in Individuals With Paraplegia

Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Spasticity, Quadriceps Muscle Strength and Functional Mobility in Individuals With Paraplegia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07583576
Acronym
FES-PAR-RCT
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-05-13
Start date
2026-05-10
Completion date
2026-07-10
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurorehabilitation, Paraplegia, Spasticity, Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injury, Paraplegia Rehabilitation, Neurorehabilitation, Spasticity, Paraplegia

Brief summary

Spinal cord injury (SCI)-related paraplegia is a complex neurological condition characterized by motor impairment, increased spasticity, and significant functional limitations in daily activities. Spasticity is one of the most common secondary complications after upper motor neuron lesions and can negatively affect rehabilitation outcomes, gait ability, and functional independence. This randomized controlled study aims to investigate the effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) applied to the quadriceps muscle in individuals with paraplegia. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a control group receiving conventional neurorehabilitation or an intervention group receiving additional FES treatment. The primary outcomes include changes in spasticity level, quadriceps muscle strength, and functional mobility. Spasticity will be assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), muscle strength will be evaluated with Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), and functional mobility will be measured using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The intervention period will last 8 weeks, with standardized rehabilitation programs applied to both groups. The FES group will additionally receive quadriceps stimulation with specific neuromuscular electrical stimulation parameters. The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of FES as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation in improving motor function and functional independence in individuals with paraplegia.

Detailed description

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major cause of long-term disability worldwide, often resulting in paraplegia when the thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal segments are affected. Individuals with paraplegia commonly experience significant impairments in voluntary motor control, muscle weakness, spasticity, and reduced functional mobility, all of which contribute to decreased independence in activities of daily living. Spasticity, defined as a velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone due to hyperexcitability of the stretch reflex, is one of the most frequent complications following upper motor neuron lesions. Although spasticity may occasionally contribute to functional stability, excessive spasticity often interferes with voluntary movement, gait training, and rehabilitation outcomes (Pandyan et al., 2005). Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is a neurorehabilitation technique that delivers electrical impulses to peripheral nerves to evoke functional muscle contractions. It facilitates neuromuscular re-education, enhances motor unit recruitment, and may promote neuroplasticity in the central nervous system. Previous studies have demonstrated that FES can improve muscle strength, walking ability, and functional independence in individuals with neurological impairments (Sheffler & Chae, 2007; Kesar et al., 2010; Hesse et al., 2003). This study is designed as a prospective, single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial conducted in accordance with CONSORT 2010 guidelines. A total of 60 participants with paraplegia secondary to spinal cord injury will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: Control Group: Standard neurorehabilitation program only Intervention Group: Standard neurorehabilitation program + FES applied to the quadriceps femoris muscle The rehabilitation program will be conducted 3 days per week for 8 weeks and will include stretching exercises, strengthening exercises, balance training, and transfer training. In the intervention group, FES will be applied 5 days per week for 8 weeks with the following parameters: 35 Hz frequency, 300 µs pulse duration, and 10 seconds on / 20 seconds off cycle. Outcome assessments will be performed at baseline (week 0) and after intervention (week 8). Spasticity will be evaluated using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), which is widely used in clinical practice for assessing muscle tone in neurological conditions. Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured using Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Functional mobility and independence will be assessed using SCIM, TUG, and 6MWT. SCIM is a validated scale specifically developed for individuals with spinal cord injury and assesses self-care, respiration and sphincter management, and mobility domains. TUG test provides an objective measure of functional mobility and fall risk, while 6MWT evaluates functional exercise capacity and endurance. The primary hypothesis of this study is that FES combined with conventional rehabilitation will significantly reduce spasticity, improve quadriceps muscle strength, and enhance functional mobility compared to conventional rehabilitation alone. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the evidence base regarding the clinical effectiveness of FES in neurorehabilitation and may support its integration into standard rehabilitation protocols for individuals with paraplegia.

Interventions

This intervention consists of a conventional neurorehabilitation program designed for individuals with paraplegia secondary to spinal cord injury. The program includes stretching exercises, progressive strengthening exercises, balance training, and transfer training. Sessions are conducted 3 days per week, 45-60 minutes per session, over a total duration of 8 weeks. This group does not receive Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). The intervention is aimed at improving general motor function, maintaining joint range of motion, and enhancing functional independence.

DEVICEFunctional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of Quadriceps Muscle

This intervention consists of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) applied to the quadriceps femoris muscle in addition to the same conventional neurorehabilitation program provided to the control group. FES is delivered using a neuromuscular electrical stimulation device to induce muscle contractions via peripheral nerve activation. Stimulation parameters include 35 Hz frequency, 300 µs pulse duration, and a 10-second on / 20-second off cycle. The intervention is applied 5 days per week for 8 weeks. The aim is to enhance neuromuscular activation, reduce spasticity, increase quadriceps muscle strength, and improve functional mobility in individuals with paraplegia.

Sponsors

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation to reduce assessment bias. Participants and care providers will not be blinded due to the nature of the intervention (FES application).

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: a control group receiving conventional neurorehabilitation and an intervention group receiving Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) in addition to conventional rehabilitation. Outcomes will be compared between groups after an 8-week intervention period. No crossover will occur between groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants will be included in the study if they meet all of the following criteria: * Aged between 18 and 65 years * Diagnosed with spinal cord injury resulting in paraplegia (traumatic or non-traumatic etiology) * Classified as ASIA Impairment Scale C or D * Medically stable condition * Presence of lower extremity spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale ≥ 1) * Ability to understand and follow simple instructions * Willingness to participate and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Participants will be excluded if they present any of the following conditions: * Presence of cardiac pacemaker or implanted electrical device * Severe cognitive impairment or communication difficulties preventing participation * Active infection or systemic inflammatory condition * Severe lower extremity contractures or deformities limiting movement * Dermatological conditions or open wounds preventing FES application * History of severe autonomic dysreflexia triggered by electrical stimulation * Uncontrolled medical conditions that may interfere with participation or safety

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spasticity LevelBaseline and Week 8Spasticity will be assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), which grades muscle tone from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate increased spasticity. The primary comparison will be the change in MAS scores between baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention.
Quadriceps Muscle StrengthBaseline and Week 8Muscle strength will be evaluated using Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale (0-5). Higher scores indicate greater muscle strength.
Functional MobilityBaseline and Week 8Functional mobility will be assessed using: Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) SCIM evaluates independence in daily activities, TUG assesses functional mobility and fall risk, and 6MWT measures walking capacity and endurance. Improvements indicate better functional mobility.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Independence (SCIM subdomains)Baseline and Week 8Changes in self-care, respiration/sphincter management, and mobility domains of SCIM will be analyzed separately.
Walking PerformanceBaseline and Week 8Total distance walked in 6 minutes (meters). Increased distance indicates improved functional endurance
Functional Mobility PerformanceBaseline and Week 8Time required (seconds) to stand up, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down. Lower time indicates improved mobility.
Spasticity SeverityBaseline and Week 8Comparison of spasticity reduction between intervention and control groups.

Contacts

CONTACTMehmet Salih TAN, Doctorate
mstan@medipol.edu.tr+905467266876

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 20, 2026