Skip to content

A Prospective Assessment of Bone Health in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A on Factor VIII vs Factor Mimetic Prophylaxis (Efa Emi Bone Health Study)

A Multi-institution Prospective Assessment of Bone Health in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A on Factor VIII vs Factor Mimetic Prophylaxis (Efa Emi Bone Health Study)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07582276
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-05-12
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2032-08-01
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia a

Keywords

Bone Health, Emicizumab, Efanesoctocog alfa, hemophilia

Brief summary

This study will compare bone mineral density in patients with severe hemophilia A receiving prophylaxis with emicizumab or efanesoctocog alfa. Participants will undergo assessments of bone mineral density, bone remodeling biomarkers, thrombin generation, plasmin generation, and joint health over a five-year period. The study aims to evaluate whether differences in prophylactic therapy are associated with differences in bone health outcomes.

Detailed description

Reduced bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures are increasingly recognized in persons with severe hemophilia A. The mechanisms underlying impaired bone health in hemophilia are multifactorial and may include reduced physical activity, chronic joint disease, inflammation, and abnormalities in coagulation-related pathways involved in bone remodeling. Thrombin has been shown to play an important role in bone metabolism through activation of protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) signaling pathways that influence osteoblast and osteoclast activity. Reduced thrombin generation in severe hemophilia A may contribute to decreased bone formation and increased bone resorption. Efanesoctocog alfa is an extended half-life factor VIII replacement therapy that maintains higher circulating factor VIII levels and supports thrombin generation. Emicizumab is a non-factor prophylactic therapy that effectively prevents bleeding but does not replace factor VIII. The comparative effects of these therapies on long term bone health have not been well established. This prospective observational study will compare longitudinal changes in bone mineral density among patients with severe hemophilia A receiving prophylaxis with emicizumab or efanesoctocog alfa over 5 years. Participants will undergo serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessments and evaluation of bone remodeling biomarkers, inflammatory cytokines, thrombin generation, plasmin generation, and joint health over a five-year period.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The participant or legally authorized representative is willing and able to provide written informed consent. 2. Diagnosis of severe hemophilia A (factor VIII activity \< 1%). 3. Male sex. 4. Age between 30 and 50 years (inclusive). 5. BMI between 18.5 and 40 kg/m2 6. The participant must have been on prophylaxis with Efanesoctocog alfa or Emicizumab for at least 3 months prior to enrollment and intend to remain on the current regimen for the next 5 years. 7. Willingness to undergo all research procedures, including DEXA scans and the collection of blood samples. 8. Willingness to complete all standard-of-care bleeding and treatment logs.

Exclusion criteria

1. Unwillingness of the participant, parent, or legally authorized representative to provide informed consent. 2. Diagnosis of a bleeding disorder other than or in addition to severe hemophilia A. 3. Active Factor VIII inhibitors at the time of enrollment 4. History of a disease known to influence bone metabolism unrelated to a bleeding disorder. (Examples: Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, Ehlers Danlos syndrome, Hyperparathyroidism) 5. Past or present treatment with any anti-osteoporotic medication, excluding oral vitamin D or oral calcium supplements. 6. Documented HIV infection or HCV infection (whether in progress or cured) at the cirrhotic stage. 7. Presence of a non-removable metal device that would interfere with research procedures. 8. Inability to tolerate a DEXA scan due to limited range of motion or body habitus. 9. History of bone fractures or surgical repair within 8 weeks prior to enrollment. 10. Participants with weight \>300 pounds, due to limitations of DEXA scanner

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Longitudinal change in femoral neck bone mineral density (g/cm²)Baseline and annually through 5 years.Bone mineral densitometry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Longitudinal change in Lumbar spine (L1-L4) bone mineral density (g/cm²)Baseline and annually through 5 years.Bone mineral densitometry
Longitudinal change in total hip bone mineral density (g/cm²)Baseline and annually through 5 years.Bone mineral densitometry
Longitudinal Change in Bone Remodeling Biomarkers and CytokinesBaseline and annually through 5 years.PINP, CTX-I, OPG, RANKL, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α
Change in Thrombin Generation and Plasmin Generation ParametersBaseline and annually through 5 yearsSimultaneous Thrombin and Plasmin Generation Assay

Contacts

CONTACTCarol D Pierce, RN
piercecarold@uams.edu501-364-4440
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDivyaswathi Citla Sridhar, MD

Arkansas Children's Reserach Institute

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026