Skip to content

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Biolimus Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) Versus Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Biolimus Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) Versus Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07582250
Enrollment
1548
Registered
2026-05-12
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2030-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Brief summary

To compare the safety and efficacy of Biolimus drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus drug-eluting stent (DES) in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions.

Interventions

DEVICEBiolimus-Coated Coronary Artery Balloon Dilatation Catheter

A total of 774 subjects meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and assigned to the treatment group of Biolimus-Coated Coronary Artery Balloon Dilatation Catheter.

DEVICEXinyue Drug-Coated Stent System

A total of 774 eligible subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and assigned to the treatment group of Excrossal™ Xinyue Drug-Coated Stent System.

Sponsors

JW Medical Systems Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients aged ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years; 2. Patients with stable angina, unstable angina, old myocardial infarction, or asymptomatic myocardial ischemia with objective evidence; 3. Patients without contraindications to coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG); 4. Patients who can understand the study purpose, voluntarily participate in the trial, sign the informed consent form, and are willing to complete follow-up as required by the protocol. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria: 1. The target lesions are de novo native coronary artery lesions, located in 1 or 2 different coronary arteries; the number of target lesions in each coronary artery shall not exceed 1 (for two-vessel disease, a maximum of 2 target lesions are permitted). 2. All target lesions shall meet the following requirements: ① The reference vessel diameter is between 2.25 mm and 4.0 mm, and the lesion length ≤ 30 mm; ② The visual estimated stenosis degree before procedure ≥ 70%, or ≥ 50% with documented ischemic evidence; ③ Successful pre-dilation: defined as no NHLBI type C or higher dissection; TIMI flow grade 3; residual stenosis ≤ 30%. 3. Each target lesion is only allowed to be treated with one investigational device or control device (except for bailout stent implantation). 4. If the patient has non-target lesions requiring concurrent intervention, such non-target lesions shall be successfully treated prior to the treatment of target lesions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary endpointDay of procedure (treatment day), 7 days post-procedure or discharge day, 30 days post-procedure, 6 months post-procedure, 9 months post-procedure, and 1 year post-procedure.The primary endpoint of target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year post-operation was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR).

Contacts

CONTACTWang Yang Project Manager
yang.wang@jwmsgrp.com13366024088
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBin Liu

Second Hospital of Jilin University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 13, 2026