Skip to content

Bilateral Versus Unilateral Lymph Node Dissection in High-Risk Prostate Cancer (BALANCE)

Bilateral or Unilateral Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: The BALANCE Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07580196
Acronym
BALANCE
Enrollment
820
Registered
2026-05-12
Start date
2026-03-30
Completion date
2030-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection, Radical Prostatectomy, PSMA PET, mpMRI, Randomized Controlled Trial, High-Risk Prostate Cancer, Unilateral Lymph Node Dissection, Bilateral Lymph Node Dissection

Brief summary

BALANCE is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolling men with unilateral high-risk localized prostate cancer identified by prostate biopsy, multiparametric MRI, and PSMA PET imaging. Eligible patients scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either unilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection or bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Pelvic lymph node dissection is commonly performed in high-risk prostate cancer for staging purposes, but its therapeutic benefit remains uncertain and the procedure may increase operative time, costs, and postoperative morbidity. Modern imaging techniques may improve the identification of patients with predominantly unilateral disease and support a more selective surgical approach. The co-primary objectives are to compare 3-year biochemical recurrence-free survival and early postoperative PSA persistence between the two surgical strategies. Secondary objectives include comparison of perioperative complications, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, quality of life, long-term oncologic outcomes, and costs. This study is designed to determine whether unilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection can reduce surgical morbidity while preserving oncologic outcomes in appropriately selected patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUnilateral Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection performed only on the side of the dominant lesion, as defined by biopsy, multiparametric MRI, and PSMA PET findings.

PROCEDUREBilateral Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection performed bilaterally according to the study surgical template during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER
AIRC (Italian Association for Cancer Research)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fondazione Ricerca Molinette
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants with unilateral high-risk localized prostate cancer scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either unilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection or bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male patients aged 18 years or older * Histologically confirmed unilateral high-risk localized prostate cancer, defined by at least one of the following: ISUP Grade Group 4 or 5; suspicion of at least cT3a disease on multiparametric MRI and/or PSMA PET; or PSA greater than or equal to 20 ng/mL with a unilateral index lesion * Unilateral features of the index lesion defined by biopsy, multiparametric MRI, and PSMA PET * No PSMA PET-positive pelvic lymph nodes contralateral to the dominant side of the prostate cancer * No significant contralateral PSMA uptake on the non-dominant side, defined as lesions with PRIMARY score 3 to 5 * No contralateral index lesion on multiparametric MRI subsequently confirmed by prostate biopsy * No high-risk histology on the side contralateral to the dominant lesion, including ISUP Grade Group greater than 3 or unconventional prostate cancer histology * No frank extracapsular invasion or seminal vesicle invasion on the contralateral side * Up to two positive systematic cores with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease or up to four with favorable intermediate-risk disease are allowed on the contralateral side * A maximum of two pelvic PSMA-positive lymph nodes allowed on the dominant side * Clinically localized disease, defined as less than cT4 on multiparametric MRI and no distant metastases, including no retroperitoneal lymph nodes on PSMA PET * Life expectancy greater than 10 years according to physician judgment * Scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and fit for surgery * Written informed consent provided

Exclusion criteria

* Any prostate cancer treatment prior to prostatectomy, including androgen deprivation therapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or focal ablative therapy * Prior active treatment for prostate cancer * Contralateral ISUP Grade Group 4 to 5 prostate cancer * Contralateral ISUP Grade Group 2 in more than 4 positive cores or ISUP Grade Group 3 in more than 2 positive cores * Contralateral cT3 disease on multiparametric MRI * N1 or M1 disease on PSMA PET or multiparametric MRI, except for up to two positive pelvic lymph nodes on the dominant side * No systematic prostate biopsies performed, with a minimum of 10 cores, and targeted biopsies when a target lesion is present * Other active malignancy * Contraindication to multiparametric MRI and/or PSMA PET * Inability to provide written informed consent * Age younger than 18 years * ASA score greater than 3 * Any contraindication to pelvic lymph node dissection * Severe psychiatric disease * Inadequate hematologic and/or coagulation function * Active infection * Any other serious medical, psychiatric, psychological, familial, or geographic condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, may interfere with staging, treatment, follow-up, compliance, or increase treatment-related risk * Patients with prior malignancy treated with curative intent are eligible only with mandatory approval by the local multidisciplinary tumor board

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival3 years after surgeryBiochemical recurrence defined as postoperative PSA greater than 0.1 ng/mL with three consecutive rises or initiation of prostate cancer-specific secondary treatment more than 6 months after surgery
PSA Persistence8 weeks after surgeryPostoperative PSA greater than 0.1 ng/mL at 6 weeks after surgery confirmed by an additional PSA measurement performed 2 weeks later.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systemic Treatment-Free Survival3 years after surgeryAbsence of systemic treatment after surgery.
Metastasis-Free Survival3 years after surgeryAbsence of metastatic disease during follow-up, including PSMA PET assessment when clinically indicated after multidisciplinary discussion.
Cost-Effectiveness1 year after surgeryCost-effectiveness assessed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year at 1 year after surgery.
Perioperative ComplicationsUp to 6 months after surgeryComplications graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification and assessed for likelihood of being related to pelvic lymph node dissection.
Operative TimeDuring surgeryTotal operative time recorded during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.
Estimated Blood LossDuring surgeryIntraoperative estimated blood loss.
Overall Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Score Assessed Using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP)1 year after surgeryOverall prostate cancer-related quality of life assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice questionnaire. The overall score is calculated by summing the five domain summary scores: urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, bowel, sexual, and vitality/hormonal. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and poorer quality of life.
Length of Hospital StayDuring the index hospitalization, up to 90 days after surgeryNumber of days from surgery to discharge from the index hospitalization.
Treatment-Free Survival3 years after surgeryAbsence of any salvage local or systemic treatment after surgery.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTChiara Fiameni
chiara.fiameni@unito.it+39 011 633 6591
CONTACTAlessandro Marquis, MD
alessandro.marquis@unito.it+39 011 633 6591
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGiancarlo Marra, MD

Principal Investigator

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 13, 2026