Skip to content

Self-Cure vs. Highly Filled Flowable Composite in Carious Cervical Lesions: 18-Month RCT

Clinical Performance of a Self-Cure Composite System Versus a Highly Filled Flowable Composite System in Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized 18 Months Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07576673
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-05-08
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carious Cervical Lesions

Keywords

Class V, Cervical Carious Lesions, Self-cure Composite, Highly Filled Flowable Composite, Stela

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the clinical performance of a self cure composite system versus a highly filled flowable composite in the restoration of carious cervical lesions over an 18 months follow up period.

Detailed description

Examination and selection of patients will be done according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A class V cavity will be prepared after local anesthesia has been given. Followed by the placement of the restorative material according to the randomization sequence. For the intervention: the primer will be applied first followed by filling of the cavity using self cure composite (Stella Automix or Stela Capsule, SDI Ltd, Australia). For the control group: etching of the cavity (Kulzer Gluma Etch, Kulzer GmbH, Germany) will be done followed by rinsing, drying, applying the bonding agent (Solobond M, Voco GmbH, Germany), curing, and lastly, applying the highly filled flowable composite (Polofil NHT flow, Voco Gmbh, Germany) and curing.

Interventions

PROCEDUREClass V Restoration - Polofil

A class V cavity with 1 mm occlusal bevel will be prepared after administering local anesthesia. Rubber dam isolation will be done, , etching of the enamel (20-30 seconds) and dentin (15 seconds) using a 35% phosphoric acid etch (Kulzer Gluma Etch, Kulzer GmbH, Germany), then rinsing for 20 seconds followed by controlled drying of the cavity till it's slightly moist. Application of the bonding agent (Solobond M, Voco GmbH, Germany) using a disposable brush and leaving it to act for 30 seconds then an air jet will be used to disperse the bonding agent. Curing for 20 seconds will be done using a LED light curing unit with curing intensity 1200-3000 mw/cm2 (CuringPen-E, Changzhou Sifary Medical Technology Co., Ltd, China). Flowable composite (Polofil NHT flow, Voco GmbH, Germany) will be placed, adapted by gold plated applicator then light polymerized for 20 seconds using light emitting diode (LED) light curing unit.

PROCEDUREClass V Restoration - Stela

A class V cavity with 1 mm occlusal bevel will be prepared after administrating local anesthesia followed by rubber dam isolation. Stela Primer (SDI Limited, Australia.) will be applied for 5 seconds on the cavity and the margins, then it will be gently dried with air for 2-3 seconds without light curing. The self-cure bulk fill resin composite (Stela Automix or Stela Capsule, SDI Limited, Australia) will be applied then sculpted using a gold-plated composite applicator (Lascod, Italy). Full polymerization will take place after 4 minutes.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient-related Criteria: A) Inclusion Criteria: * Patients consulting in the outpatient clinic with cervical carious lesion. * Age between 21-45 years. * Males and females. B)

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic disease or severe medical complication. * Allergy to any of the restorative materials. * Pregnancy. * Disabilities. * Heavy smoking; xerostomia. * Lack of compliance. * Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or temporomandibular joint disorders or bizarre habits. Tooth-related Criteria: A) Inclusion Criteria: * Small to moderate class V carious lesion. * Teeth are vital with no signs of irreversible pulpitis. * Caries cervical margins above the CEJ. * Well-formed and fully erupted in normal functional occlusion with natural antagonist. B)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention18 MonthsThe restoration will be clinically assessed according to the modified USPHS criteria. Restoration will be given Alpha score when there is no loss of restoration. It will be given a Charlie score when there is loss of restoration and need for replacement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal Adaptation18 monthsThe restoration will be clinically assessed according to the modified USPHS criteria. It will be give an Alpha score when the restoration is closely adapted with no detectable margin. It will be given a Bravo score when there is a detectable marginal discrepancy, but it still clinically acceptable. It will be given a Charlie score when there is a marginal crevice that is clinically unacceptable.
Marginal Discoloration18 monthsThe restoration will be clinically assessed according to the modified USPHS criteria. It will be given an Alpha score when there is no discoloration between the tooth and the restoration. It will be given a Bravo score when there is superficial discoloration which can be polished away. It will be give a Charlie score when the discoloration has penetrated beyond the margin in pulpal direction.
Post-operative Sensitivity18 monthsThe restoration will be clinically assessed according to the modified USPHS criteria. It will be give an Alpha score when there is no post-operative sensitivity and a Charlie score when there is post-operative sensitivity.
Recurrent Caries18 monthsThe restoration will be clinically assessed according to the modified USPHS criteria. It will be given an Alpha score when there is no detectable recurrent caries and a Charlie score when recurrent caries is detected.
Surface Roughness18 monthsThe restoration will be clinically assessed according to the modified USPHS criteria. It will be given an Alpha score when there is no surface defect. It will be given a bravo score when there is minimal surface defect. It will be given a charlie score when there is a severe surface defect.
Color Match18 monthsThe restoration will be clinically assessed according to the modified USPHS criteria. It will be given an Alpha score when the restoration matches the color of the tooth. It will be give a Bravo score when there is an acceptable mismatch. It will be given a Charlie score when there is an unacceptable mismatch.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTAbdelrahman Hamza, Bachelor of Science
abdelrahmanh.hamza@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+20 1063330630

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 7, 2026