Skip to content

Volar Locking Plate Comparison With External Fixator

Comparison of the Outcomes of Volar Locking Plate Versus External Fixator in Distal Intra-articular Radius Fractures.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07576075
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-05-08
Start date
2025-10-05
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2026-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Articular Fracture

Brief summary

Local data has shown conflicting results regarding the outcomes of volar locking plates versus external fixators in distal intra-articular radius fractures. Therefore, the current study was planned with the objective of comparing the outcome of a volar locking plate versus an external fixator in distal intra-articular radius fractures.

Detailed description

Determining which method provides superior early functional recovery through this study would be beneficial for generating local data. Understanding and applying improved anatomical reduction techniques and achieving lower complication rates would enable these individuals to mobilize and return to their daily lives more quickly, ultimately enhancing their quality of life.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVolar locking plates

Patients will be treated with volar locking plates. The distal radius fragments will be stabilized using the conventional modified Henry's volar technique with 2.4 mm locking compression plates.

Patients will be employed with an external fixator, directly fixing to the second or third metacarpal bone using 3-mm pins and the radius using 4-mm Schanz pins.

Sponsors

Muhammad Aamir Latif
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any gender * Aged 20 to 60 * with intra-articular fractures of the distal radius * The fracture lasted less than seven days

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with bilateral distal radius fractures and any further related injuries or fractures * Distal radius open fractures * Individuals receiving immunosuppressive, chemotherapeutic, or corticosteroid medications (based on medical history and records) * Individuals with underlying medical co-morbidities, such as diabetes and uncontrolled hypertension, (determined by their medical history and record)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative time2 hoursOperative time will be measured in minutes from skin incision to skin closure.
Blood Loss3 hoursBlood loss will be estimated in milliliters, measuring clots in a suction bottle, the difference between the pre- and postoperative sponge weights using the 1 g-1 ml formula, and blood clots in a clenched fist.
Wrist function3 monthsWrist function will be evaluated using the Mayo Wrist Score. Patient frequencies will be recorded, with scores of 90-100 points reflecting an excellent outcome, 80-89 points indicating a good outcome, 60-79 points representing a satisfactory outcome, and scores below 60 points denoting a poor outcome.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTBurhan Ulhaq
burhankhan224@gmail.com+923326456246
CONTACTAbdul-Munaf Saud, FCPS
drabdulmunafsaud@gmail.com+923005111668
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBurhan Ulhaq

Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur

STUDY_DIRECTORAbdul-Munaf Saud, FCPS

Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 9, 2026