Skip to content

A COMBINATION OF RECTAL INDOMETHACIN AND COLD WATER EXPOSURE OF THE AMPULLA AFTER ERCP IS SUPERIOR TO RECTAL INDOMETHACIN ALONE IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF POST-ERCP PANCREATITIS -RCT

A COMBINATION OF RECTAL INDOMETHACIN AND COLD WATER EXPOSURE OF THE AMPULLA AFTER ERCP IS SUPERIOR TO RECTAL INDOMETHACIN ALONE IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF PEP

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07574970
Acronym
ERCP
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-05-08
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreas Disease

Brief summary

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has emerged as the primary modality in the management of biliary and pancreatic disease. The complications occurring from ERCP can range from mild to fatal. Procedure related complications are Pancreatitis , Bleeding , Infections- Cholangitis, Cholecystitis , Perforations of which Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common serious adverse event. Reported incidence of PEP is 8.6-10.7% according to studies(overall RCTs).In India it is 6.6% (2020 study). Prevention as well as early detection and management of PEP results in a satisfactory outcome. Multiple RCTs and meta-analyses show rectal indomethacin/diclofenac significantly reduce PEP in average- and high-risk patients; now recommended by ASGE/ESGE for nearly all ERCPs. Other measures for prevention of PEP are prophylactic pancreatic duct stents in high-risk anatomy/instrumentation; wire-guided cannulation; minimizing PD contrast; periprocedural aggressive lactated Ringer's hydration. Cryoprevention effect was shown to reduce postprocedure papillary edema and thus lower the risk of PEP 1. Rectal NSAIDs reduce but do not eliminate PEP. 2. Cold-water ampullary cooling is biologically plausible but under-studied. 3. First study to demonstrate if combination of rectal indomethacin and cold-water irrigation may have a synergistic effect. 4. First study in Indian population.

Detailed description

• Assess whether combination therapy reduces PEP compared to NSAIDS alone. Secondary Aims: * Compare PEP severity (Cotton grading and revised Atlanta criteria). * Adverse effects * Length of hospital stay and/or intensive care unit stay * Assess feasibility and adherence and fidelity of cooling protocol. * Explore effect modification by baseline PEP risk (average vs high-risk), type of intervention (diagnostic vs therapeutic ERCP), and prophylactic pancreatic stenting use DESIGN AND DURATION OF THE STUDY: Single centre pilot randomised control superiority trail over 12 months with 30 days followup INCLUSION / EXCLUSION CRITERIA: * Inclusion criteria: * Standard ERCP indication * Consent given * Exclusion criteria: * Pregnancy and lactation * Chronic calcific pancreatitis / pancreatic divisum / pancreatic head malignancy / acute pancreatitis within 14 days of ERCP * ERCP for biliary/pancreatic stent exchange or removal or prior biliary sphincterotomy * Chronic kidney disease with GFR \<30 or acute kidney injury. * Presence of rectal anomaly * Active GI bleeding or high bleeding risk precluding NSAIDs;platelet \<50000/L;INR \>1.5 not correctable * NSAID allergy * Cirrhosis Child-Pugh C * Temp instability or severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding cooling/shock risk. * Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (Type 3)

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. Standard ERCP indication 2. Consent given

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy and lactation 2. Chronic calcific pancreatitis / pancreatic divisum / pancreatic head 3. malignancy / acute pancreatitis within 14 days of ERCP 4. ERCP for biliary/pancreatic stent exchange or removal or prior biliary sphincterotomy 5. Chronic kidney disease with GFR \<30 or acute kidney injury. 6. Presence of rectal anomaly 7. Active GI bleeding or high bleeding risk precluding NSAIDs;platelet \<50000/L;INR \>1.5 not correctable 8. NSAID allergy 9. Cirrhosis Child-Pugh C 10. Temp instability or severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding cooling/shock risk. 11. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (Type 3)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Categorisation of Post ERCP Pancreatitis10 DaysIncidence of Post ERCP Pancreatitis by Cotton criteria: severity graded as mild/ moderate/ severe per consensus

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum amylase and lipase 24 hours post ERCP.24 hoursTo evaluate the serum amylase and lipase levels 24 hours after ERCP procedure
Abdomen pain score assessment24 hoursTo check pain levels every 4 hours up to 24 hours post ERCP procedure
Adverse events detection : GI bleeding, perforation, cholangitis, aspiration, hypoxemia24 hoursTo detect adverse events post procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

CONTACTRajesh Goud Mr Maragoni, M.Pharm,MBA,PGDCA
rajeshgoud761@gmail.com04023378888
CONTACTMohana Dr Prafullah, MD DNB
mona.prafullah@gmail.com04023378888
STUDY_DIRECTORMohan Dr Ramchandani, MD DM

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 13, 2026