Skip to content

Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Using 3D Titanium Miniplate Versus Standard Two Plate Fixation

Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Using 3D Titanium Miniplate Versus Standard Two Plate Fixation a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07574554
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-05-08
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2026-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Force Measurement, Mandible Fracture

Brief summary

Hypothesis The investigators hypothesis that fixation of mandibular angle fractures using a 3D titanium miniplate will provide better occlusal bite force than intraoral fixation using the standard two-plate technique. The investigators expect that this method will facilitate a faster recovery time for participants to regain baseline occlusion force.

Interventions

DEVICETwo Standard Plate Fixation

Fixation using two titanium miniplates. One plate at the inferior border of the mandible with bicortical screws. Second plate \~5 mm above or at the external oblique ridge with monocortical screws.

DEVICE3D Titanium Miniplate (2.0 mm, 8-hole).

Single 2.0 mm 9-hole 3D titanium plate fixed with monocortical screws. Plate contoured with horizontal crossbars perpendicular and vertical struts parallel to fracture line. Screws placed diagonally first.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Age from 20 to 50years. * Male . * Patients with mandibular angle fractures.

Exclusion criteria

* • Patients with contraindication to general anesthesia * Patients with comminuted angle fractures. * Patients with relevant systemic diseases contraindicating surgery or affecting bone healing. * Patients with infected condyle and coronoid fractures. * Gun-shot injuries. * Edentulous fractures. * Pathological fractures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occlusal forcefirst day surgery , second visit 30 days , the last visit 120 days. .use bite force measurement device . make patient bite to muser the force (, newton unit).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
maximal incisal opening.first day surgery , second visit 30 days , the last visit 120 days. .Ask the patient to open their mouth as wide as possible without feeling pain. Using a ruler or caliper, measure the vertical distance between the incisal edge of the upper central incisor and the incisal edge of the lower central incisor
Patient satisfactionfirst day surgery , second visit 30 days , the last visit 120 days. .will be measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with zero being unsatisfied and ten being satisfied and happy .

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 9, 2026