Skip to content

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Safety of Percutaneous and Open Brachial Access in the Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Lesion

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Safety of Percutaneous and Open Brachial Access in the Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Lesion

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07573644
Acronym
BRAVO
Enrollment
246
Registered
2026-05-07
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2026-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endovascular Surgery, Endovascular Treatments, Peripheral Arterial

Keywords

peripheral arterial, endovascular treatments, endovascular surgery

Brief summary

Endovascular treatment tends to replace open surgery in the management of peripheral arterial disease. Access via the common femoral artery remains the primary approach for peripheral arterial interventions. Brachial artery access has emerged as a valid alternative when femoral access is not feasible. Brachial access can be achieved either percutaneously or through an open surgical approach at the elbow. A limited number of studies have reported complication rates associated with open and percutaneous brachial access in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. These studies have shown higher complication rates for percutaneous access (ranging from 6% to 9%) compared with open brachial access (ranging from 1% to 2%). However, no direct comparison between the two approaches has been reported to date. This study is the first to provide a direct, prospective, randomized comparison between open brachial access and percutaneous brachial access

Interventions

PROCEDUREExperimental arm

Endovascular procedure for peripheral arterial lesions via brachial access

Endovascular procedure for peripheral arterial lesions via femoral access

Sponsors

University Hospital, Brest
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Endovascular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure via the brachial approach compatible with a 5F to 7F introducer * Patient affiliated with a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Adult patient under legal guardianship or curatorship * Contraindication to endovascular treatment * History of brachial artery puncture within the past 1 month * History of open surgical approach at the elbow * Presence of a stent at the puncture site * Acute upper limb ischemia * Life expectancy of less than one month * Patient refusal to participate in the study * Allergy to aspirin or clopidogrel * Pregnant woman * Patients not speaking the French language, refusing or unable to comply with the follow-up proposed in the study * Requirement for another endovascular procedure or open surgery within 30 days following the BRAVO study procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of at least one complication (yes/no) at the access siteDay 30

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of at least one major systemic complication (yes/no)Day 30
Measure of Quality of Life with the EQ5D-5L questionnaryDay 30
Procedure timeDay 1
Length of hospital stay.up to 2 years

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTBAHAA NASR
bahaa.nasr@chu-brest.fr+33 02 98 34 74 28

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 8, 2026