Skip to content

High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation vs Standard of Care for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation vs Standard of Care for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Adaptive Platform Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07572097
Enrollment
288
Registered
2026-05-07
Start date
2026-05-05
Completion date
2029-05-05
Last updated
2026-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

BPH

Keywords

BPH, h-fire, turp, holep

Brief summary

The study aims to find a better surgical treatment for men with an enlarged prostate (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, or BPH) that effectively relieves urinary symptoms without sacrificing sexual function. Currently, standard surgeries like TURP or HoLEP are very effective at opening the blocked urinary channel. However, because they use heat or mechanical energy to remove prostate tissue, they often cause unwanted side effects, most notably the loss of normal ejaculation (retrograde ejaculation) and potential impacts on erectile function. This study is testing a novel, minimally invasive technology called High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation (H-FIRE). Instead of using heat to burn or cut the tissue, H-FIRE delivers ultra-short electrical pulses to destroy the blocking prostate tissue. This "non-thermal" (heat-free) approach is uniquely designed to spare the delicate nerves, blood vessels, and muscles surrounding the prostate, which are critical for preserving normal sexual function and bladder control. In this clinical trial, 288 men aged 50 and older with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms will be randomly assigned to receive either the investigational H-FIRE procedure or the Standard of Care surgery (TURP or HoLEP). The main goal of the study is to prove that H-FIRE is just as effective as standard surgery in relieving lower urinary tract symptoms over 12 months. More importantly, the study will evaluate if H-FIRE is superior in helping patients achieve the "BPH Trifecta"-meaning the patient successfully achieves significant symptom relief, maintains perfect bladder control (uses zero pads), AND fully preserves normal ejaculation. By utilizing this new tissue-sparing technology, the trial hopes to offer aging men a treatment option that restores their urinary health while fully protecting their overall quality of life.

Interventions

PROCEDUREH-FIRE

High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation (H-FIRE) is a novel, non-thermal, tissue-selective ablation technique. Under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance, 19-gauge monopolar electrodes are inserted transperineally via a template to bracket the prostatic transition zone. The H-FIRE generator delivers ultrashort bursts of high-voltage microsecond-pulsed electric fields . This rapidly destabilizes the transmembrane potential, creating permanent nanoscale pores in the cell membrane and inducing cellular apoptosis rather than coagulative necrosis. This unique non-thermal mechanism is designed to effectively ablate obstructing prostatic adenoma while sparing the collagenous architecture of neurovascular bundles and the external sphincter.

PROCEDURESurgical Standard of Care (TURP or HoLEP)

The Standard of Care (SoC) intervention comprises guideline-endorsed transurethral surgical procedures for benign prostatic obstruction. The specific surgical modality is strictly mandated by baseline prostate volume stratification to ensure optimal therapeutic efficacy. For prostates measuring 30 to 80 mL, surgeons perform either Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP, Monopolar or Bipolar) or Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). For larger prostates (\>80 to 150 mL), HoLEP is strictly mandated. Both procedures are performed under anesthesia with the clinical goal of achieving complete anatomical removal of the obstructing adenoma (resection to the surgical capsule for TURP, or anatomical enucleation for HoLEP).

Sponsors

Shanghai East Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Moderate-to-severe symptoms, defined as IPSS ≥13. Prostate volume (PV) between 30 and 150 ml, measured by multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) or Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS). Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤15 ml/s. Note: To ensure validity, the voided volume during uroflowmetry must be ≥125 ml; tests with lower volumes must be repeated. Competency to provide informed consent and comply with long-term follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Suspected or histologically confirmed prostate cancer. Patients with PSA \>4 ng/ml must undergo mpMRI; those with PI-RADS ≥3 lesions require a negative biopsy before enrolment. Neurogenic bladder, detrusor underactivity, or active urinary tract infection (UTI). Previous prostate surgery, pelvic irradiation, urethral stricture, or bladder neck contracture. Presence of metallic implants incompatible with H-FIRE pulse delivery (e.g., non-compatible pacemakers). Inability to safely discontinue anticoagulation if required by the assigned surgical protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Baseline and 12 monthsThe IPSS is a validated 7-item questionnaire assessing lower urinary tract symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 35. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms (0-7: mildly symptomatic; 8-19: moderately symptomatic; 20-35: severely symptomatic). A decrease in the score indicates symptomatic improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants Achieving the "BPH Trifecta"1,3,6,12 monthsThe "BPH Trifecta" is a composite success endpoint defined as the simultaneous achievement of three criteria: (i) Effective de-obstruction (IPSS reduction \>=50% from baseline or total score \<8); (ii) Social Continence (0 pads/day); and (iii) Preservation of Ejaculation (MSHQ-EjD Function Score \>=2).
Change from Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) ScoreBaseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 monthsThe IIEF-5 is a validated questionnaire assessing erectile dysfunction. Total scores range from 1 to 25. Higher scores indicate better erectile function and lesser severity of dysfunction.
Change from Baseline in Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) Short Form ScoreBaseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 monthsThe MSHQ-EjD Short Form assesses ejaculatory function. The function domain score ranges from 1 to 15. Higher scores indicate better ejaculatory function (greater frequency, strength, and volume).
Change from Baseline in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax)Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 monthsMaximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) evaluated via uroflowmetry. Assessed with a minimum voided volume requirement of 125 mL. Higher values indicate better urinary flow and less obstruction.
Change from Baseline in Post-Void Residual (PVR) Urine VolumeBaseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 monthsPost-void residual (PVR) urine volume measured via transabdominal ultrasound immediately after a voluntary void. Lower values indicate better bladder emptying.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to 12 months post-procedureAdverse events will be systematically recorded and graded. Surgical complications will be classified using the Clavien-Dindo Classification system. General medical adverse events and genitourinary symptoms will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Key Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) include urethral stricture, transient/permanent incontinence, and retrograde ejaculation.
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)12 monthsThe ICER will be calculated from a societal perspective as the incremental cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained. QALYs will be derived from the EQ-5D-5L utility index scores. Lower ICER values indicate a more cost-effective intervention.

Contacts

CONTACTShanghai East hospital ethics committee
siwei_bao@163.com+86-021-38804518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 8, 2026