Skip to content

Point of Care Testing INR in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Explaining the Differences Between Capillary INR and Plasma INR in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07570511
Acronym
POCTAS
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-05-06
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Vitamine K Antagonist (VKA) Treatment

Keywords

INR, vitamin K, Antiphospholipid

Brief summary

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune and prothrombotic disorder that can affect up to 10% of young people experiencing a thrombotic event. Its treatment relies on long-term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Direct oral anticoagulants, which are simpler to use because they do not require regular blood monitoring, are contraindicated because they are associated with an increased risk of thrombotic recurrence in some patients with APS. Patients with APS receive VKAs and must regularly have their Index Normalized Ratio (INR) measured via a cumbersome venous blood draw. Capillary INR measurement systems are already used in certain situations, such as in patients with mechanical heart valves. The use of these systems improves the quality of life of these patients and, above all, the stability of VKA therapy, thus preventing potentially serious hemorrhagic complications or thrombotic recurrences. In antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), these systems are discouraged due to perceived differences between capillary and venous INR (the reference method). However, among the few studies on the subject, none demonstrated significant discrepancies between patients with APS and controls, and when such discrepancies were observed, the origin of this variability could not be determined. We hypothesize that the biological profile of antiphospholipid antibodies is responsible for the INR differences.

Interventions

DEVICECoaguchek

Point of care testing INR using Coaguchek device

Sponsors

Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with APS treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) * Patients with an LA profile without aCL or anti-β2GPI (isolated LA) * Patients with an LA and aCL + anti-β2GPI profile (triple positivity) * Patients with another biological profile (other than isolated LA or triple positivity) * Control patients without aCL or anti-β2GPI treated with VKAs * Adult patients * Patients who have undergone a prior clinical examination appropriate for the research * Individuals who have received complete information on the organization of the research and have not objected to their participation and the use of their data * Patients covered by a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) not treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) * Women of childbearing age without effective contraception * Persons covered by Articles L. 1121-5, L. 1121-7, and L. 1121-8 of the French Public Health Code: * Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding women * Unemancipated minors * Adults under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or protective supervision)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discrepancy between Coaguchek and venous INRAt enrollmentPercentage of patients per group with a fixed 20% discrepancy between a capillary INR measured on a Coagucheck© device and a venous INR according to subgroups and variables

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discrepancy between MicroLine and venous INRAt enrollmentPercentage of patients per group with a fixed 20% discrepancy between a capillary INR measured on a MicroLine INR© device and a venous INR according to subgroups and variables
Discrepancy between Coaguchek and MicroLine INRAt enrollmentPercentage of patients per group with a fixed 20% discrepancy between a capillary INR measured on a Coagucheck© and MicroLine devices according to subgroups and variables

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTStéphane ZUILY, MD, PhD
stephane.zuily@univ-lorraine.fr03 83 15 73 54

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026