Skip to content

In Vivo Noradrenergic System and Aging

Diving Into the in Vivo Noradrenergic System : Role of the alpha2C-adrenergic Receptors

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07569120
Acronym
NA2C-PET-MRI
Enrollment
165
Registered
2026-05-06
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2029-10-01
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Aging and Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Noradrenaline, alpha2C, Aging, Parkinson's disease, PET, MRI, Locus Coeruleus, Behavior

Brief summary

The main goal of this research proposal is to provide, for the first time in humans, a wider understanding of the role of the noradrenergic system both in health and illness (here Parkinson's disease) through the use of a newly developed radiotracer visualizing alpha2C-ARs (\[11C\]ORM-13070) combined with a cutting-edge technology, the hybrid PET/MRI scanner. The secondary aim will be to determine whether the expected age- and PD-related changes in the noradrenergic system are paralleled by changes in neuropsychological performances (i.e. cognitive, motor and/or olfactory abilities).

Interventions

A battery of neuropsychological tests will assess cognitive, emotional, and sensory domains linked to noradrenaline function. Participants will complete the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for global cognitive function, the Digit Span and Free Recall tests for memory, the Trail Making, Tower of London and Stroop tests for executive functioning, Beck Depression Inventory for mood, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for anxiety, the Epworth and RBD screening questionnaire for sleep, the visual analog and Kings PD scales for pain, the Lille Apathy Rating Scale for apathy, the VOSP for visuo-spatial capacity, the PDFS-16 for fatigue, the UPPS for impulsivity, and the SCOPA-AUT for autonomic assessment.

An olfactory screening (30-40 min) using the extended ODOFIN (BURGHART) Sniffin' Sticks Test battery (Burghart Messtechnik Denmark). This battery consists of 3 tests: The threshold (T) test has 48 Sniffin' Sticks (32 blanks and 16 dilutions with 2-Phenylethanol) and is used to ascertain the participant's olfactory threshold. The discrimination (D) test consists of 48 Sniffin' Sticks (16 triplets of odorants) where the participant must tell the odd one out in the triplet. The identification (I) test consists of 16 Sniffin' Sticks with everyday smells which the participant has to name using a selection card containing four choices. Together, these make up the TDI score.

OTHERPET/MRI scanning session

Each participant will undergo 45 min of PET/MRI recording that will begin immediately after an intravenous bolus injection of \[11C\]ORM-13070 (350 MBq ± 10%) and will last for 45 minutes in a resting state. During this time, MRI acquisition will include several MRI sequences: 1) One sagittal MP-RAGE sequence of high-resolution anatomical 3D T1-weighted images (5 min); 2) One 3D T2 FLAIR sequence (5 min); (3) One turbo spin-echo (TSE) neuromelanin-sensitive sequence (7 min, Garcia-Lorenzo et al., 2013); 3) One echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence in the axial plane (15 min duration) to acquire diffusion images; and 4) One 13-min resting-state fMRI run using high resolution T2\* weighted gradient-echo EPI sequences covering the entire brain and including the lower brainstem.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for the healthy controls: * Age between 20 years and 80 years * Weight between 40kg and 100kg * Without neurologic or psychiatric history * Without head trauma history including loss of consciousness superior to 30 minutes. * With highly effective contraception for women of childbearing age * Affiliated to a social security or similar scheme * Not subject to any legal protection measures * Participant must have signed an informed consent document Inclusion Criteria for the patients with Parkinson's disease: * Age between 40 years and 80 years * Weight between 40kg and 100kg * With an idiopathic Parkinson's disease (Dopa-sensitive) * Without head trauma history including loss of consciousness superior to 30 minutes. * Without associated neurological pathology * With highly effective contraception for women of childbearing age * Affiliated to a social security or similar scheme * Not subject to any legal protection measures * Participant must have signed an informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

for all participants : * Subject receiving (or having received in the last month) somatic medication with cerebral or psychological effects (e.g., antihistamines), see list in Appendix1 * Subjects with a current or past dependence on alcohol or any other addictive substance according to DSM-IV-TR criteria, with the exception of nicotine and caffeine; - * Subjects already participating in another biomedical research project or who have participated in a study using ionizing radiation within the past year; * Pregnant woman parturient or breastfeeding * MRI contraindications (: people using pacemaker or insulin pumps, with implanted or embedded metal objects in the head or body, claustrophobic, with neurosensory stimulators or implantable defibrillators, with cochlear implants, with ferromagnetic foreign bodies in the eye or brain close to nerve structures, agitation of the subject (uncooperative or agitated subjects), ventriculoperitoneal neurosurgical shunt valves, dental appliances) * Subject with a contraindication to PET scans at the ORM: hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients (sodium chloride) * Subjects who are unable to understand or complete the study (language barrier, obvious lack of motivation, etc.) as judged by the investigator. * Subjects who do not agree to be informed in the event of an incidental finding of an abnormality on MRI or during neuropsychological assessment. * Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision. * Persons receiving psychiatric care. * Persons admitted to a health or social care facility for purposes other than research.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PET measuresDay 1Derived from the PET data, the binding potential (BPND) parametric maps will be calculated using compartmental modelling techniques.
IRM measureDay 1Derived from the MRI data, the LC will be defined with a semi-automatic method from the MRI sequence sensitive to neuromelanin, and its signal intensity will be calculated for each participant as previously described (Laurencin et al., 2024a)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Cognitive AssessmentDay 2Measured with Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Outcome measure is between 0 and 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal.
Memory AssessmentDay 2Measured with the 16-item Free and Cued Recall test. Outcome measure is the total immediate recall which is the sum of free and cued recall.
Working memory AssessmentDay 2Measured with the Digit Span Memory test. Outcome measure is the total number of items correctly repeated.
Executive FunctioningDay 2Measured with the Trail Making test. Unit of measure is first seconds to perform the test, which will be converted in a percentile score and then number of errors made during the test.
Planning FunctioningDay 2Measured with the Tower of London test. Outcome measure is the total correct and total moves score.
Verbal fluenciesDay 2Measured with both the category (semantic fluency) and letter (phonemic fluency) test. Outcome measure is the total number of words generated within 60 sec excluding repetitions
Visuo-spatial AssessmentDay 2Measured by the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. The study will use a selection of theses tests : incomplete letters (outcome measure is between 0 and 20; cut-off score = 16) and number position discrimination (outcome measure is between 0 and 10; cut-off score = 7)
Depression EvaluationDay 1Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II Questionnaire. Outcome measure is between 0 and 20 with a cut-off score = 13. A score higher than 14 indicates the presence of depression
Anxiety EvaluationDay 1Measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) form Y questionnaire. Outcome measure is between 20 and 80, with higher scores correlating with greater anxiety
Day time sleepiness evaluationDay 2Measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale Questionnaire. Outcome measure is between 0 and 24 with a score between 0-8 indicating normal Daytime sleepiness, a score between 9-14 indicating mild sleep deficiency and a score above 15 an excessive daytime sleepiness.
Sleep QualityDay 2Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Outcome measure is between 0 and 21 with 0 indicating no sleep problem and 21 major sleep disorder.
Rapid Eye Movement Behavior disorderDay 2Measured by the RBDSQ. Outcome measure is between 0 and 10 with 0 indicating no RBD problem and 10 major RBD disorder.
Pain AssessmentDay 1Measured by the Visual Analog Pain Scale. Outcome measure is between 0 and 10 with 0 indicating no pain problem and a score higher than 7 an extreme pain.
Apathy AssessmentDay 2Measured by the Lille Apathy rating scale. Outcome measure is between -36 to 36 with -36 indicating absence of apathy and 36 severe apathy
Fatigue AssessmentDay 2Measured by the Parkinson's disease fatigue Scale (PDFS-16).Outcome measure is between 0 and 80,higher score indicating extreme fatigue.
Impulsivity assessmentDay 2Measured by the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale. Outcome measure is between 0 and 80, higher score indicating severe impulsivity.
Autonomic functionDay 2Measured by the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease (SCOPA-AUT). Outcome measure is between 0 and 69,higher score indicating presence of autonomic dysfunctions.
Olfactory assessment: odor thresholdDay 2Outcome measure is between 0 and 16,higher score indicating better performance.
Olfactory assessment: odor discriminationDay 2Outcome measure is between 0 and 16 with higher score indicating better performance.
Olfactory assessment: odor identificationDay 2Outcome measure is between 0 and 16 with higher score indicating better performance.

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTChloé Laurencin, MD / PhD
chloe.laurencin@chu-lyon.fr472118022
CONTACTBénédicte Ballanger, PhD
benedicte.ballanger@cnrs.fr472138978

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026