Skip to content

Impact of Force Control of Hip Abductor Muscles in Healthy Adults and Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

Impact of Force Control of Hip Abductor Muscles on Postural Control in Middle-aged and Older Adults and Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07568951
Enrollment
210
Registered
2026-05-06
Start date
2023-08-01
Completion date
2029-07-31
Last updated
2026-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Parkinson's Disease (PD)

Keywords

Old, Parkinson's disease, muscle force, force steadiness, balance, gait performance

Brief summary

Both aging and Parkinson's disease (PD) negatively affect postural control and increase the risk of falls, with frontal plane balance being particularly challenging for these populations. While previous studies have mainly focused on sagittal plane balance, the contribution of hip abductor muscles remains unclear, especially regarding their force production and control abilities. Therefore, this study aims to investigate hip abductor muscle force production and force control, and to examine whether these factors are associated with postural control, gait, and balance performance in individuals across different ages and those with PD.

Detailed description

Both aging and Parkinson's disease (PD) negatively affect postural control and increase the risk of falls, with frontal plane balance being particularly challenging for these populations. Previous studies have mainly focused on sagittal plane balance and have identified the important roles of ankle plantar flexors and knee extensors; however, the contribution of hip abductor muscles-key muscles for frontal plane stability-remains unclear, particularly in terms of their force production and control abilities. Therefore, this study aims to investigate hip abductor muscle force production and force control, and to examine whether these factors are associated with postural control, gait, and balance performance in individuals across different ages and those with PD. Healthy young, middle-aged, and older adults will be recruited from the community, and individuals with PD will be recruited from the Department of Neurology. Healthy participants must be in good health, able to walk independently, demonstrate normal cognitive function, and provide informed consent, while those with neurological, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, or other conditions affecting motor performance will be excluded. For individuals with PD, inclusion criteria will be a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 to 3, stable anti-PD medication use, and the ability to follow instructions and walk at least 10 m. Exclusion criteria will include psychiatric, immune, integumentary, or musculoskeletal disorders, neurological conditions other than PD, lower extremity pain, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, or inability to provide informed consent. All participants will undergo a one-time assessment, including maximal voluntary isometric contraction, force steadiness, postural control, and gait performance. Surface electromyography will be used to assess neuromuscular function, postural control will be evaluated using a force plate under multiple standing conditions, and gait parameters will be measured at both comfortable and fast walking speeds. Statistical analyses will be conducted using ANOVA to examine group differences.

Interventions

OTHERAge

We compare the young, middle-aged, and old groups

OTHERParkinson's disease (PD)

We compare the healthy group and PD group.

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Chang Gung University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy people Inclusion Criteria: * 20 to 39 years (young), 40 to 59 years (young), and 60-85 years (old) * generally in good health * able to walk 10 m independently * able to follow all instructions

Exclusion criteria

* neurologic, psychiatric, immune, integumentary, and musculoskeletal diseases or disorders which might influence this study * any pain over the lower extremities * uncontrolled cardiovascular diseases * unable to provide informed consent. PD Inclusion Criteria: * clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD * Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 to 3 * stable anti-PD medications * able to walk 10 m independently * able to follow all instructions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal forceBaselineThe maximal force of lower extremity muscles
Rate of torque developmentBaselineThe ability to rapidly generate muscle force
Force steadinessBaselineThe ability to maintain a constant force output during a submaximal contraction
Walking speedBaselineThe time taken by participants to walk a standardized distance
Step LengthBaselineThe linear distance between the two ankles, typically expressed in centimeter(cm).
CadenceBaselineThe number of steps taken per minute (SPM)
Single Support TimeBaselineThe duration within the gait cycle when only one foot is in contact with the ground, typically measured in seconds or as a percentage of the total gait cycle.
Double Support TimeBaselineThe portion of the gait cycle where both feet are in contact with the ground, indicating the transition phase between steps, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle or in seconds.
Swing TimeBaselineThe portion of the gait cycle where the foot is not in contact with the ground, moving forward to the next step. It is usually expressed as a percentage of the total gait cycle or in seconds.
Center of Pressure (COP) Velocity in Balance TasksBaselineThe speed at which the COP moves, calculated over the duration of the balance task. Higher velocities may reflect more dynamic balance adjustments or instability. Unit:millimeter per second(mm/s)
Center of Pressure (COP) Area in Balance TasksBaselineThe area covered by the COP trajectory during the balance task, providing an estimate of the sway envelope. A larger area might indicate poorer balance control. Unit:square millimeter(mm\^2)
Timed Up-and-Go TestBaselineTthe time an individual takes to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down.
Four Square Step TestBaselineParticipants will be required to perform four square step test by changing directions while stepping forward, sideway, and backward over a low obstacle as fast as possible.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

CONTACTChu-Ling Yen
clyen@mail.cgu.edu.tw886-3-2118800
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChu-Ling Yen

Chang Gung University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 9, 2026