Skip to content

ProVu Video Stylet With Versus Without the Fekry Airway

Comparison of Intubation Time and Performance Between the ProVu Video Stylet With Versus Without the Fekry Airway in Adults With Normal Airway: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07568743
Enrollment
130
Registered
2026-05-06
Start date
2026-05-10
Completion date
2026-10-10
Last updated
2026-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endotracheal Intubation, Video Rigid Stylet

Brief summary

This study aimed to compare assisted intubation using the ProVu video stylet device passing through Fekry airway versus intubation without the use of Fekry airway . The investigators hypothesized that endotracheal intubation assisted by ProVu video stylet using the Fekry airway as a conduit for intubation would improve the glottic visualization and the higher first attempt success rate when compared to endotracheal intubation assisted by ProVu video stylet without using the Fekry airway.

Interventions

DEVICEProVu video stylet

Group C (n=55): Intubation using the ProVu video stylet without the Fekry Airway.

DEVICEProVu video stylet and Fekry Airway

Group F (n =55): endotracheal Intubation assisted by the ProVu video stylet and using Fekry Airway

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II. * Patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation of less than 2 hours duration . * Ganzouri Airway score \<3.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with Active cardiac condition. * Patient with airway congenital anomaly. * Mallampati score III or IV. * Body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m² (obesity). * Limited cervical spine mobility. * History of difficult intubation, upper airway surgery, or trauma. * Facial or oropharyngeal deformities. * Allergy or contraindication to study medications. * Refusal to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to successful intubationwithin 15 minutes preoperativelyIt is defined as time in seconds elapsing from touching assimply of ProVu video stylet to insisors (C group)or to Fekry Airway ( F group) till connecting the endotracheal tube to ventlatory circuate after removal of assimply

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTReham Ali Abdelrahman, Assistant Professor, M.D.
rehamali72@hotmail.com01009136408
CONTACTReham Ali Abdelhaleem Abdelrahman, M.D. 00201009136408, M.D.
rehamali72@hotmail.com
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORReham Ali Abdelrahman

Cairo University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 9, 2026