Skip to content

The Effect of Kinesio Taping on Hand Functions in Zone V-VI Extensor Tendon Injuries

Investigation of the Effect of Kinesio Taping on Hand Functions in Zone V-VI Extensor Tendon Injuries: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07567248
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-05-05
Start date
2026-05-07
Completion date
2027-06-07
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extensor Tendons of Finger Anomalies, Tendon Injuries

Keywords

Extensor tendon, Functional recovery, Extensor lag

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the effects of Kinesio Taping (KT) on hand function in patients with Zone V-VI Extensor Digitorum Communis (EDC) tendon injuries following primary repair. Extensor tendon injuries in this region often lead to complications such as adhesion formation, reduced range of motion, extensor lag, and impaired hand function, despite standard rehabilitation approaches. Therefore, additional interventions that may enhance tendon gliding and neuromuscular control are of clinical interest. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, patients will be assigned to either a KT group or a sham taping control group. Both groups will receive a standardized postoperative rehabilitation program, while the intervention group will additionally receive KT applications between postoperative weeks 6 and 12. Outcome measures, including range of motion, grip and pinch strength, and functional hand performance, will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. The study seeks to determine whether KT provides additional benefits beyond conventional rehabilitation in improving functional recovery after extensor tendon injuries, addressing an important gap in the current literature.

Interventions

OTHERKinesio Taping

Button-Hole Technique (Affected finger(s)) I-Strip Technique (Support for all metacarpal bones) Supportive Tape Application

Sham Button-Hole Technique (Affected finger(s)) Sham I-Strip Technique (Support for all metacarpal bones) Sham Supportive Tape Application

Sponsors

Pamukkale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18 and 65 years * Having an isolated Zone V-VI extensor tendon injury * Having undergone primary treatment for the injury

Exclusion criteria

* History of prior surgery on the affected extremity * Presence of accompanying neurological, orthopedic, rheumatologic, or metabolic disease in the affected extremity * Presence of flexor tendon injury * Presence of fractures of the metacarpals, carpal bones, or radius/ulna * Presence of an open incision line * Delayed wound healing * Presence of peripheral nerve injury * Presence of replantation or amputation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Finger ROM MeasurementPost operative at 12 and 24 weeksWith the wrist in a neutral position, active flexion and extension movements of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints will be measured using a metal finger goniometer.
Assessment of Gross Grip and Pinch StrengthPost operative at 12 and 24 weeksGross grip strength will be measured using a hand dynamometer, and pinch strength will be measured in four different positions (tip, pulp, lateral, and three-point pinch) using a pinch meter (Jamar® Hydraulic Dynamometer-Pinchmeter, Serial No: 1420513), according to the standard measurement protocol of the American Society of Hand Therapists.
Michigan Hand Outcomes QuestionnairePost operative at 12 and 24 weeksThe MHQ was developed to measure health status in patients with hand deformities and assesses how well patients perform their usual activities. Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated by summing all domain scores and dividing by six. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. The questionnaire will be administered by the researchers through face-to-face interviews using a question-and-answer format

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTHANDE USTA OZDEMIR, PhD
husta@pau.edu.tr+902582964279

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026