Skip to content

A Real-world Study Comparing the Effectiveness of Ofatumumab and Ocrelizumab Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Comparative Effectiveness of Kesimpta® (Ofatumumab) Versus Ocrevus® (Ocrelizumab) in Real-world Practice: A Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07566988
Enrollment
2604
Registered
2026-05-05
Start date
2024-10-25
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2026-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis, Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Ofatumumab, Ocrelizumab, Real-world evidence, Comparative effectiveness, Annualized relapse rate, Healthcare resource utilization

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and economic burden of ofatumumab (OMB) and ocrelizumab (OCR) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in the United States using data from an administrative claims database.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Pooled OMB and OCR Cohorts: * ≥1 incident claim for OMB (Pooled OMB Cohort) or OCR (Pooled OCR Cohort) in the patient identification period (index date = first claim date). * No claims for OMB or OCR within the 12 months prior to the index date. * ≥2 outpatient (OP) medical claims (at least 30 days apart) with a diagnosis code for MS (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification \[ICD-10-CM\] code: G35) in any position, with the first claim occurring in the 12 months prior to or on index date and the second claim up to 6 months after index date, or ≥1 inpatient (IP) claim with a diagnosis of MS in the first position in the 12 months prior to or on index date. * ≥18 years of age on index date. * Continuous healthcare plan enrollment for ≥12 months prior to index date (baseline period) and ≥6 months after index date (follow-up period). * Persistent use of OMB (Pooled OMB Cohort) or OCR (Pooled OCR Cohort) for ≥6 months after index date. Treatment-naïve OMB and OCR Cohorts: * Included in Pooled OMB Cohort or Pooled OCR Cohort. * No claims for a disease modifying therapy (DMT) used for the treatment of MS within the 12-month baseline period.

Exclusion criteria

• None.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) in Treatment-Naïve PatientsUp to approximately 3 years and 11 monthsARR was defined as the number of relapse episodes per patient-year (PPY) during the follow-up period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ARR in All PatientsUp to approximately 3 years and 11 monthsARR was defined as the number of relapse episodes per PPY during the follow-up period.
Healthcare Visits PPYUp to approximately 3 years and 11 monthsHealthcare visits included IP stays, OP visits, and emergency department visits.
Inpatient Days PPYUp to approximately 3 years and 11 months
Difference in Healthcare Costs in OMB Versus OCRUp to approximately 3 years and 11 monthsHealthcare costs included IP, OP, emergency department, and pharmacy costs.

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORNovartis Pharmaceuticals

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 12, 2026