Skip to content

AI-Supported Gamified Training for Sharps Injury Prevention in Nurses

The Effect of An Artifıcial Intelligence-Supported Gamifıed Training Program on Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward The Prevention of Sharps Injuries

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07562867
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-05-01
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Needlestick Injuries, Occupational Exposure, Sharps Injuries

Keywords

Sharps injuries, Nursing education

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effect of a Health Belief Model (HBM)-based, artificial intelligence (AI)-supported gamified training program on nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward the prevention of sharps injuries. Sharps injuries remain a significant occupational risk for healthcare workers, particularly nurses, despite existing standard precautions. The study will be conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the validity and reliability of the Sharps Injury Prediction Scale will be tested in a nurse population. In the second phase, a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design will be used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. The study will be carried out in two hospitals from the same healthcare group located in different cities to prevent interaction between groups. A total of 36 nurses will be included, with 18 participants in the intervention group and 18 in the control group. The intervention group will receive a structured, HBM-based training program consisting of seven sessions incorporating AI-supported content, gamified scenarios, interactive materials, and feedback mechanisms to enhance engagement and promote behavior change. The control group will receive routine institutional training on sharps injury prevention. Data will be collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and two months later. Outcome measures include nurses' knowledge, attitudes toward safe sharps use, and sharps injury risk perception. It is expected that the AI-supported gamified training program will significantly improve knowledge, attitudes, and risk awareness compared to routine training. The findings may support the integration of innovative, theory-based educational interventions into institutional training programs to enhance occupational safety.

Detailed description

Sharps injuries are among the most common occupational hazards for healthcare workers, particularly nurses, due to their frequent exposure to invasive procedures and contact with blood and body fluids. These injuries are associated with the risk of transmission of serious infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV. Despite the implementation of standard precautions and institutional training programs, the incidence of sharps injuries remains a significant concern, highlighting the need for more effective and behavior-focused educational interventions. Traditional training methods are often limited in their ability to promote sustained behavioral change. In this context, theory-based and technology-supported approaches may provide more effective solutions. The Health Belief Model (HBM) is widely used to explain and predict health-related behaviors by focusing on individuals' perceptions of risk, benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy. Integrating HBM into educational interventions may enhance the effectiveness of training programs aimed at improving safe practices. In addition, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and gamification have introduced innovative opportunities in health education. AI-supported systems can provide personalized learning experiences, while gamification techniques, such as interactive scenarios, feedback, and rewards, can increase motivation, engagement, and knowledge retention. These approaches may be particularly beneficial in nursing education, where active participation and behavioral reinforcement are essential. This study will be conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the validity and reliability of the Sharps Injury Prediction Scale will be evaluated in a nurse population. In the second phase, a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design will be used to assess the effectiveness of an HBM-based, AI-supported gamified training program. The study will be carried out in two hospitals within the same healthcare group located in different cities to minimize interaction between groups. A total of 36 nurses will be included. The intervention group will receive a structured training program consisting of seven sessions designed based on HBM constructs, incorporating AI-supported educational materials, gamified learning tools, and interactive components. The control group will receive routine institutional training. Data will be collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and two months after the intervention. Outcome measures will include knowledge levels, attitudes toward safe use of sharps, and risk perception related to sharps injuries. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the development of innovative, theory-based educational strategies and support the integration of AI-supported and gamified training approaches into healthcare institutions to enhance occupational safety among nurses.

Interventions

A structured training program consisting of seven sessions, incorporating artificial intelligence-supported educational content, gamified scenarios, interactive videos, and digital feedback mechanisms to enhance learning and promote behavior change.

BEHAVIORALcontrol group

Standard training provided by the institution, including lectures and question-answer sessions on sharps injury prevention.

Sponsors

Baskent University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study will use a non-randomized parallel group design with pretest, posttest, and two-month follow-up assessments. Groups will be assigned by hospital to prevent interaction between participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Registered nurses working in the participating hospitals * Working in the institution for at least 2 months (Phase 1) or newly employed within the last 1 month (Phase 2) * Willing to participate in the study * Able to use smartphone-based technologies * Providing written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Having received prior training based on the Health Belief Model for sharps injury prevention * Previous professional nursing experience before current employment (for newly recruited nurses in Phase 2) * Being on leave during the data collection period * Failure to attend training sessions (intervention group) * Incomplete data collection forms * Withdrawal from the study at any stage

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nurses' knowledge level regarding sharps injury preventionBaseline (pretest), immediately after the intervention (posttest), and 2 months after the interventionKnowledge level will be assessed using a structured knowledge questionnaire consisting of 25 items developed based on the literature. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge regarding sharps injury prevention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attitudes toward safe use of sharpsBaseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2 months after the interventionAttitudes will be measured using the "Attitude Scale for Safe Use of Sharps Medical Instruments," a validated Likert-type scale. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward safe practices.
Sharps injury risk perception and prediction scoreBaseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2 months after the interventionRisk perception and prediction will be assessed using the adapted Sharps Injury Prediction Scale based on the Health Belief Model. Higher scores reflect increased perceived severity, benefits, and awareness of preventive behaviors.

Contacts

CONTACTİsmail Kuşoğlu, PhD. Student
22310206@mail.baskent.edu.tr+905062172248
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZiyafet Uğurlu, Professor

Baskent University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026