Skip to content

Using the Boneflo System During Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Analysis of the Intraoperative Use and Handling of the Boneflo Tissue Collector System in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07562165
Acronym
BoneFlo
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-05-01
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2026-03-01
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Bone Defects, Delayed Bone Healing, Nonunion Fracture

Brief summary

Critical bone defects, non-unions, and delayed bone healing remain major challenges in orthopedic and trauma surgery and often require bone grafting. While a patient's own bone (autograft) is considered the gold standard, its use is limited by donor-site morbidity and limited availability. Synthetic bone substitutes offer an alternative but mainly provide structural support and lack biological activity. This prospective multicenter pilot study evaluates the safety and feasibility of using the Boneflo® Tissue Collector System to biologically activate bone substitutes during surgery. The device collects the patient's own tissue, blood, and biologically active factors directly from the surgical site using a vacuum-assisted suction system with an integrated filter. This material is then used intraoperatively to coat and bioactivate bone substitute materials. In healing attempts, 50 patients with critical bone defects, non-unions, or impaired bone healing were treated across four centers. Various bone substitutes, including synthetic calcium phosphate materials, collagen-based scaffolds, and allografts, were used. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate device safety, intraoperative usability, handling, and applicability for coating and activating bone substitutes. The device was evaluated by orthopedic surgeons and other medical professionals, including nurses, physician assistants, and technical assistants. Furthermore, these data were supplemented with clinical outcome data from healing attempts, including wound healing and radiographic bone regeneration, assessed over a minimum six-month follow-up period.

Interventions

OTHERIntraoperative bioactivation of bone substitute materials using the Boneflo® Tissue Collector System.

During surgery, autologous tissue, blood, and biologically active components are collected from the surgical site under vacuum conditions with an integrated filter system using the BoneFlo tissue collector. The collected autologous material is used to coat and biologically enhance bone substitutes. Bone substitutes include calcium phosphate ceramics, collagen-based scaffolds, and allografts. This intervention is performed intraoperatively and aims to improve the biological activity of otherwise mainly osteoconductive materials.

Sponsors

Universität Duisburg-Essen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with critical size bone defects, non-unions or delayed bone healing Indication for bone grafting (autologous, allogeneic, or synthetic) Age ≥ 18 years Written informed consent obtained prior to surgery Ability to comply with follow-up visits for at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Active local or systemic infection Vertebral body defects (according to device instructions for use) Active malignancy or tumor-related bone disease Severe systemic disease affecting bone healing (e.g., autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency) Contraindication to surgery or anesthesia Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of device-related adverse events (% of participants)Up to 30 days postoperativelyAssessment of safety of the surgical suction device used for intraoperative bioactivation of bone substitutes, measured by the number and proportion of participants experiencing device-related adverse events, as recorded in clinical evaluation and adverse event reporting.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgeon-reported usability score (Likert scale)Immediately after the procedureAssessment of device applicability and handling using a standardized surgeon questionnaire with a Likert scale rating immediately after use.
Rate of successful intraoperative bioactivation proceduresIntraoperatively (during the index surgical procedure)Assessment of intraoperative feasibility based on successful completion of the procedure as judged by the operating surgeon. The unit of measure is the percentage of procedures (% of procedures).

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026