Skip to content

Therapeutic Cuddling in Critically Ill Children

Therapeutic Cuddling in Critically Ill Kids (THE ChICKS) Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07562048
Acronym
THE ChICKS
Enrollment
112
Registered
2026-05-01
Start date
2025-12-08
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit, Pain

Keywords

Therapeutic cuddling, PICU, Pain, Delirium, Agitation

Brief summary

2.1 CONTEXT Pain and agitation are common comorbidities of pediatric critical illness due to both underlying disease processes and ICU related therapies. These are associated with both short and long term negative sequelae including increased mortality, length of stay, rates of ICU delirium, worse sleep, increased anxiety, depression, and chronic pain. The current standard of care to manage PICU associated pain and agitation is the use of analgosedation (e.g. opioids and benzodiazepines) these too are associated with increased time on the ventilator, length of stay, ICU delirium, and long term mental health and negative neuro-cognitive outcomes. Despite recommendations for increased use of non-pharmacologic therapies in the prevention and management of PICU associated pain, agitation, delirium, and analgosedation exposure, there are currently know therapies with clear evidence of efficacy. Therapeutic cuddling (e.g. kangaroo care, clothed cuddling, comfort holding, etc.) has been shown to decrease pain and anxiety in critically ill neonates, and healthy children and adults. Positive affective touch and hugging has known physiologic benefits and has been associated with decreased pain, improved immunity, and decreased mortality. Despite the potential for this intervention to aid in the prevention and management of PICU associated pain, agitation, delirium and analgosedation exposure, little data exists on efficacy of therapeutic cuddling in critically ill children. 2.2 OBJECTIVES 2.2.1 Primary Determine the feasibility of screening, consent, randomization, and retention of participants in a pragmatic RCT of therapeutic cuddling versus standard of care in the Alberta Children's Hospital Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. 2.2.2 Secondary 1. Determine treatment fidelity of participants randomized to the intervention arm. 2. Determine the prevalence of the therapeutic cuddling intervention in those randomized to the standard of care arm. 3. Determine the feasibility of measurement of key outcomes and co-variates (i.e., pain, agitation, sedation, delirium, analgosedation exposure, parental presence). 4. Describe the experience of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals in delivering/receiving the therapeutic cuddling intervention. 2.3 STUDY DESIGN Pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of a structured co-designed therapeutic cuddling intervention as compared to the standard of care in a single tertiary care PICU. 2.4 DURATION 6 months to 1 year 2.5 LOCATION, DEPARTMENTS, AND FACILITY WHERE RESEARCH WILL BE UNDERTAKEN The pediatric intensive care unit at the Alberta Children's Hospital 2.6 SAMPLE SIZE A total sample size of 112 participants (56 per arm)

Interventions

OTHERTherapeutic cuddling

In bed or out of bed cuddling provided by a caregiver that involves at least two points of body contact with at least one providing pressure (e.g. arm over the torso or child in lap of parent)

OTHERStandard of care

Cuddling or not as decided by the care team.

Sponsors

University of Calgary
Lead SponsorOTHER
Alberta Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- expected duration of admission of \> 48 hours.

Exclusion criteria

* Previously enrolled

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of randomizationFrom PICU admission to end of enrollment period (96 hours) or PICU discharge whichever occurs firstProportion of those consented who are successfully randomized.
Feasibility of consentFrom PICU admission to end of enrollment period (96 hours) or PICU discharge whichever occurs firstProportion of patients who are approached who provide consent.
Ability to retain participantsFrom PICU admission to end of enrollment period (96 hours) or PICU discharge whichever occurs firstProportion of randomized participants who complete study procedures

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of the therapeutic cuddling intervention in those randomized to the standard of care armFrom enrollment up to 14 study days or PICU discharge, whichever occurs first.Proportion of shifts with 1 or more cuddling events out of all shifts for those randomized to the standard of care arm
Feasibility of measurement of key outcomes and co-variates (i.e., pain, agitation, sedation, delirium, analgosedation exposure, parental presence)From enrollment up to 14 study days or PICU discharge whichever occurs firstProportion of participants with complete data entry for each variable of interest
Describe the experience of patients in receiving the therapeutic cuddling interventionUntil the end of the study period, expected to complete within 18 months.Conduct 1:1 interviews for patients
Describe the experiences of parents with therapeutic cuddlingUntil the end of the study period, expected to completed within 18 months.1:1 interviews
Experience of HCP with delivering Therapeutic CuddlingUntil study completion, an average of 18 months1:1 Interviews

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTLaurie A Lee, PhD
laurie.lee@ucalgary.ca403-510-7661

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026