Skip to content

3D-Printed Mobile Phone Holder for Individuals With Upper Limb Impairments

Design and Implementation of a 3D-Printed Mobile Phone Holder Selection and Fitting Process for Individuals With Upper Limb Functional Impairments

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07561944
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-05-01
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficulty Operating Smartphones Due to Upper Limb Impairment, Hand Function Impairment, Musculoskeletal Disorders Affecting Hand Function, Upper Limb Dysfunction

Brief summary

Individuals with upper limb functional impairments, such as those resulting from stroke, spinal cord injury, musculoskeletal disorders, or degenerative joint disease, often experience difficulties operating smartphones. Standard devices typically require bilateral, precise fine motor control, which can limit independence, participation, and access to digital communication for this population. Although assistive products such as phone stands, straps, or styluses are available, they are often designed as "one-size-fits-all," lack individualization, and may not be well integrated into daily life. Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers advantages of customization, modularity, low cost, and rapid production, and may support better matching between users and assistive devices. However, in clinical practice, the use of 3D-printed assistive technology is constrained by the lack of an integrated resource platform and standardized fitting procedures. This exploratory intervention study aims to develop a 3D assistive device selection interface and a standardized fitting process for smartphone-related devices targeting adults with upper limb dysfunction. Approximately 30 outpatients will be recruited from a regional teaching hospital in northern Taiwan and will receive a 1-week intervention using a 3D-printed mobile phone holder or related assistive device, with occupational therapist support. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will examine smartphone task performance and satisfaction with the assistive technology. Feasibility, usability, and preliminary effectiveness will be evaluated to inform the development of a sustainable clinical service model.

Detailed description

Upper limb dysfunction due to neurological, musculoskeletal, or degenerative conditions frequently interferes with the performance of fine motor tasks, including smartphone operation. Many individuals with unilateral weakness, limited range of motion, pain, or grip instability find it difficult to hold a phone securely, touch the screen accurately, or perform multi-step operations such as dialing, messaging, or taking photos. As smartphones have become central tools for communication, information access, and social participation, these limitations can widen the "digital divide" and negatively affect independence and quality of life. Although a variety of commercial assistive devices exist (e.g., generic phone stands, straps, styluses, and gripping aids), they are often designed for the "average user" and may not accommodate severe deformities, contractures, or complex motor coordination problems. Many users and clinicians must improvise or modify existing devices, which is time-consuming and may compromise stability and safety. Clinical decision-making regarding assistive device selection frequently relies on individual therapist experience rather than standardized procedures or objective criteria, and patients often lack access to systematic information about available options, features, and indications. Three-dimensional (3D) printing provides a promising avenue for developing lightweight, modular, and customizable assistive devices that can be tailored to each user's anatomy and functional needs. Prior research has demonstrated that 3D-printed assistive devices can improve functional performance, reduce pain, and increase satisfaction in populations with upper limb impairments. However, in routine rehabilitation practice, the implementation of 3D-printed assistive technology is hindered by (1) the absence of an integrated platform that consolidates design models, indications, and material/safety guidance, and (2) the lack of standardized fitting workflows and validated evaluation tools, which limits reproducibility and wider adoption across therapists and settings. Objectives This study is designed as an exploratory intervention to: Develop an internal 3D assistive device selection interface (menu system) that consolidates smartphone-related assistive resources suitable for individuals with upper limb movement difficulties. Establish a standardized fitting process (SOP) for smartphone operation supports (e.g., single-hand or bilateral phone holders). Modify and modularize 5-8 commonly used smartphone assistive devices (e.g., holders, straps, desk or forearm-mounted supports) to enhance functional usability and convenience. Evaluate the clinical feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of these devices in terms of functional performance, user satisfaction, and efficiency, and use these findings to inform a sustainable service model. Study Design and Setting The study adopts a single-group, pre-post exploratory intervention design. Participants will be recruited from the outpatient rehabilitation department of a regional teaching hospital in northern Taiwan. Eligible participants will be adults with upper limb functional impairments who experience difficulties using a smartphone and are able to follow instructions and provide informed consent. Intervention After baseline assessment, each participant will undergo a structured selection and fitting process using a 3D-printed smartphone assistive device (e.g., custom mobile phone holder or related support). An internal 3D device menu/interface will support therapist-patient joint decision-making based on functional needs and hand function status. Participants will be instructed to use the assigned 3D-printed assistive device for at least 10 minutes per day over 1 week in their daily environment. During the intervention period, an occupational therapist will provide two individual follow-up sessions (approximately 15 minutes each) to: Review the participant's functional abilities and goals. Explain and demonstrate correct device use and recommended practice activities. Monitor compensatory patterns, provide posture and movement corrections, and adjust the device or training tasks as needed. Participants will be asked to complete a brief daily log documenting device usage (e.g., whether used, duration), activity examples, and any discomfort or adverse events. Outcome Measures Assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the 1-week intervention (post-intervention) by trained occupational therapists who are not involved in the fitting process. Primary outcomes will include: Smartphone operation task performance, assessed through standardized tasks such as: Searching the contact list and making a call Dialing a phone number using the keypad Answering a call Sending a text or instant message Taking a photo Performance metrics will include completion time, observable errors, and task completion. Secondary outcomes will include: User satisfaction with the assistive device, measured using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Feasibility indicators, such as adherence to daily device use (from logs), therapist-rated fitting feasibility, and the occurrence and nature of adverse events. Data Analysis Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize participant characteristics, device use patterns, and feasibility indicators. Non-parametric tests will compare pre- and post-intervention functional performance and satisfaction scores. Adverse event rates will be calculated to describe safety and tolerability. Linear regression and general linear model-based univariate analyses may be used to explore associations between baseline factors and changes in functional outcomes, where appropriate. Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS 26.0, with the significance level set at α \< 0.05. The findings of this exploratory trial will inform the refinement of the 3D-printed device library, the standardized fitting process, and the clinical workflow, with the long-term goal of developing a scalable and sustainable 3D-printed assistive technology service model for individuals with upper limb functional impairments.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Currently receiving occupational therapy in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. * Onset of condition \> 3 months. * Presence of upper-limb functional impairment that causes difficulty or limitations in smartphone use. * Able to understand instructions for using the assistive device. * Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score \> 24.

Exclusion criteria

* Age younger than 18 years. * Severe visual or hearing impairments that would affect the ability to perform smartphone tasks. * Unstable medical condition that may interfere with participation in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Smartphone Functional Performance TestBaseline and 1 week after interventionA task-based performance assessment designed to evaluate the efficiency of smartphone hardware operations. Tasks include: (1) calling a contact, (2) dialing a number, (3) answering a call, (4) sending a text message, and (5) taking a photo. Outcome metrics include completion time, number of steps, error rate, and step completeness. Each task is scored on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating better smartphone-operating performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)Baseline and 1 weekAssesses upper-limb muscle tone on a 0-4 scale, where higher scores indicate more severe spasticity. Used to monitor whether muscle tone influences device use.
Active Range of Motion (AROM) of Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, and FingersBaseline and 1 weekAngle goniometry measuring shoulder flexion (0-180°), abduction (0-180°), external rotation (0-90°), internal rotation (0-70°), and elbow flexion (0-150°). Greater ROM indicates better joint mobility (Gerhardt et al., 2001).
NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX)Baseline and 1 weekA multidimensional subjective workload assessment measuring mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. Each domain is rated on a scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher perceived workload.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)1 weekA user-rated questionnaire measuring satisfaction with assistive technology device characteristics, including dimensions, weight, ease of use, comfort, and effectiveness. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the assistive device.
Daily Usage and Activity LogDaily for 1 weekParticipants record daily device usage duration, practice activities, and any adverse events (skin redness, pressure pain, slippage, pinching injury, etc.). Used to monitor adherence and safety throughout the intervention.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

CONTACTFen-Ling Kuo, Master
08655@s.tmu.edu.tw+88622490088
CONTACTChieh-Yu Pan, Master
08411@s.tmu.edu.tw022490088
STUDY_CHAIRFen-Ling Kuo, Master

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 12, 2026