Skip to content

High Velocity Nasal Insufflation Versus Non Invasive Ventilation in COPD Patients With Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

High-velocity Nasal Insufflation Versus Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in COPD Patients With Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07561177
Acronym
HVNI vs NIV CO
Enrollment
66
Registered
2026-05-01
Start date
2023-07-01
Completion date
2025-07-01
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Brief summary

This study is a randomized clinical trial that compares two methods of non-invasive respiratory support in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) complicated by acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Eligible adult patients admitted with this condition will be randomly assigned to receive either High-Flow Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) or Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV). The main goal of the study is to evaluate changes in blood gas levels, especially carbon dioxide (PaCO2), after one hour of treatment. Secondary outcomes include the need for invasive ventilation, length of hospital stay, changes in breathing rate, and in-hospital outcomes. The study aims to determine whether HVNI can provide a safe and effective alternative to NIV in this group of patients.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted on adult patients diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) complicated by acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (type II respiratory failure), admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit or emergency department. COPD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and acute exacerbations associated with hypercapnic respiratory failure represent a major cause of hospital admission and intensive care utilization. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the standard of care in such cases; however, its use may be limited by patient intolerance, discomfort, and contraindications. High-Flow Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) is an emerging non-invasive respiratory support modality that delivers heated, humidified oxygen at high flow rates, generating low levels of positive airway pressure, reducing dead space ventilation, and improving oxygenation and ventilation. It may offer improved patient comfort and tolerance compared to NIV. In this study, eligible patients will be randomly assigned into two groups: Group I: High-Flow Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) Group II: Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Baseline clinical data, arterial blood gases, and severity scores will be recorded. Patients will be monitored for clinical and laboratory response. The primary endpoint is the mean difference in PaCO2 to evaluate the short-term effect of HVNI and NIV from baseline to one hour after randomization. The secondary endpoints include the following outcomes: Treatment change rates (switch to other ventilatory support modality due to clinical deterioration) Proportion of patients with PaCO2 worsening or reduction less than 10 mmHg from baseline, or no improvement in dyspnea Respiratory rate Changes in arterial blood gases Duration of mechanical ventilation (invasive and non-invasive) Length of hospital stay In-hospital mortality

Interventions

DEVICEHigh-Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI)

High-velocity nasal insufflation delivering heated and humidified oxygen at high flow rates through nasal cannula. It provides low level positive airway pressure, washout of anatomical dead space, reduction of work of breathing, and improvement in oxygenation and ventilation in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Non-invasive ventilation delivered via face mask providing positive pressure support to improve alveolar ventilation, decrease PaCO2, correct respiratory acidosis, and reduce work of breathing in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into two parallel groups: one receiving High-Flow Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) and the other receiving Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV). Outcomes will be compared between the two groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged ≥18 years Diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (PaCO2 \> 45 mmHg with acidosis or indication for ventilatory support) Indication for non-invasive ventilatory support Hemodynamically stable patients Ability to provide informed consent or legal representative consent

Exclusion criteria

Age \<18 years Immediate need for invasive mechanical ventilation (e.g., apnea, respiratory arrest, severe respiratory distress) Severe hypoxemia (PaO2 \< 55 mmHg despite oxygen therapy) Severe acidosis (pH \< 7.25) with hypercapnia Neuromuscular disease Unstable hemodynamics (SBP \< 90 mmHg or MAP \< 65 mmHg despite resuscitation) Hypercapnic respiratory failure due to non-COPD causes Contraindications to HVNI or NIV (facial trauma, obstruction, severe agitation, etc.) Pregnancy BMI \> 30 kg/m²

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2)Baseline and 1 hour after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for escalation to invasive mechanical ventilationUp to 4 days after randomizationProportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation
Change in arterial pH from baseline to 24 hours after randomizationBaseline and 24 hours
Change from baseline in arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO₂)Baseline to 24 hours after randomization
Change from baseline in respiratory rateBaseline to 24 hours after randomization
Length of hospital stayUp to 30 days

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTOREman Mostafa moazen, MD,PhD

Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREntsar Sayed ahmed, MD,PhD

Faculty of Medicine al Azhar University

STUDY_DIRECTORMagd Mohamed Galal, MD, PhD

Faculty of Medicine al Azhar University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026