Addressing Food Access and Physical Activity to Improve Diabetes Prevention Outcomes Among Underserved African Americans

Diabetes, Food Security, Nutrition Security, Physical Activity

diabetes, obesity, community-based participatory research, Weight loss, Cluster randomized trial, lifestyle change program, faith-based organizations, African American

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an enhanced, culturally, socially, and structurally tailored Diabetes Prevention Program (E-DPP) can improve weight loss and related diabetes risk factors in African American adults with prediabetes living in low-income, socially vulnerable communities. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the enhanced DPP (E-DPP) lead to greater percent weight loss at 6 and 12 months compared to the standard culturally tailored DPP (S-DPP)? * How do social determinants (e.g., food insecurity, stigma, access to resources) influence weight loss and engagement in lifestyle behaviors? Researchers will compare a standard culturally tailored DPP (S-DPP) to an enhanced DPP (E-DPP) to see if improving access to healthy food, physical activity, and community resources increases weight loss and improves diabetes-related outcomes. Participants will 1. Attend DPP sessions delivered in community settings (e.g., churches) 2. Receive lifestyle education focused on diet, physical activity, and weight loss 3. Engage in physical activity (including in-class exercise sessions \[E-DPP only\] and community-based options) 4. Receive support for healthy eating, including food deliveries (\[E-DPP only\]), food selection guidance, and referrals to food assistance programs 5. Receive information and support for accessing community resources for food and physical activity

This study is a cluster-randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced, culturally, socially, and structurally tailored Diabetes Prevention Program (E-DPP) compared to a standard culturally tailored DPP (S-DPP) among African American adults with prediabetes residing in low-income, socially vulnerable communities. The trial will enroll approximately 408 participants across 12 community-based sites (churches), which will be randomized to deliver either S-DPP or E-DPP to minimize contamination across intervention conditions. Both intervention arms are grounded in the evidence-based DPP lifestyle intervention and incorporate cultural tailoring strategies to improve relevance and acceptability in African American communities. The enhanced intervention builds upon this foundation by explicitly addressing multilevel social determinants that influence engagement in healthy eating and physical activity. Specifically, E-DPP integrates structural supports to improve access to healthy foods and safe, low-cost physical activity opportunities, alongside strategies to address social stigma related to obesity, poverty, and food insecurity. The E-DPP includes additional components delivered during and between sessions. These include provision of fruits and vegetables during sessions, experiential activities focused on healthy food selection and budgeting, and facilitated linkage to community food resources such as food pantries and assistance programs. Physical activity support includes structured in-session exercise and guidance on accessing community-based physical activity programs. Participants in the E-DPP arm will also receive tailored text messaging designed to reinforce behavior change, promote utilization of community resources, and reduce stigma-related barriers to engagement. The intervention is delivered over a 12-month period, with assessments conducted at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. A community-engaged approach informs intervention design and implementation, ensuring alignment with local context and resources. The study is guided by theoretical frameworks that emphasize the role of social and structural determinants in shaping health behaviors and outcomes. In addition to evaluating intervention effects, the study will examine potential mediators and moderators of weight loss, including social determinant-related stressors, access to resources, and psychosocial factors. A concurrent process evaluation will assess intervention fidelity, dose, participant engagement, acceptability, and feasibility, as well as cost-related considerations. These data will inform identification of key intervention components and support future scalability and dissemination of the enhanced program in underserved communities.

No related papers found yet.

United States