Skip to content

Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AGE Serum in Post-menopausal Patients on Hormone Replacement Therapy Taking Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonist

A Prospective, Single Center, Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of AGE Serum in Post-menopausal Patients on Hormone Replacement Therapy Taking Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonists

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07558603
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-04-30
Start date
2026-04-20
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2026-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laxity; Skin

Keywords

GLP1, HRT, Hormone replacement therapy, weight loss, skin laxity, skin texture, skin tone

Brief summary

The primary objective is to assess the safety and efficacy of the AGE Serum in improving the appearance of skin in post-menopausal subjects on HRT and non-HRT who are takingGLP-1 agonist therapy through the use of investigator assessments, subject questionnaires/assessments, photography, skin imaging, and reported adverse reactions.

Detailed description

Enrolled subjects will be in one of two groups, they will apply a topical serum (AGE Serum) to the full face and neck twice daily for 12 weeks. Subject follow-up visits will occur at Week 6 and Week 12. Subjects will complete assessments and participate in and standardized 2D and 3D (Visia) digital photography.

Interventions

DRUGOn GLP1 plus HRT

AGE serum is a topical that contains a high concentration of 30% Proxylane and a synergistic blend of fruit-derived flavonoids (blueberry, pomegranate) and Cassia alata extract.

DRUGOn GLP1 Only

AGE serum is a topical that contains a high concentration of 30% Proxylane and a synergistic blend of fruit-derived flavonoids (blueberry, pomegranate) and Cassia alata extract.

Sponsors

Goldman, Butterwick, Fitzpatrick and Groff
Lead SponsorOTHER
L'Oreal
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

50 post-menopausal subjects will be enrolled in to one of two groups, each group will be provided with the exact same products. Group A= On a GLP1 plus an HRT (hormone replacement therapy) Group B= On a GLP1 only

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Post-menopausal women (25 on HRT, 25 non HRT all must be post-menopausal) 2. Presence of mild to moderate signs of facial aging (e.g., fine lines, laxity, dull texture) based on modified Griffith scale. 3. Adult women aged 45-65 years. 4. Fitzpatrick skin types I-VI. 5. Current treatment with a stable dose of any GLP-1 agonist medication, including Ozempic, Rybelsus, or Wegovy for at least the last 3 months 6. Must be willing to sign a photography release and ICF,and complete the entire course of the study. 7. Subjects in good general health based on the investigator's judgment and medical history.

Exclusion criteria

1. Non post-menopausal state. 2. Any uncontrolled systemic disease. 3. History of autoimmune connective tissue disease. 4. Current use of immunosuppressive medication. 5. Significant history or current evidence of a medical, psychological or other disorder that, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude enrollment into the study. 6. Active dermatitis or active infection in the proposed treatment area. 7. Mesotherapy; dermal fillers, biostimulator injectables; radiofrequency device treatments; microfocused ultrasound device treatments; cryolipolysis; high intensity focused electromagnetic energy device treatment; or surgery during the 12-month period before study treatment. 8. Microneedling treatments of the face and neck during the 1 month period before study treatment 9. Laser and light based device treatments of the face and neck. Ablative lasers 6-month period before study treatment, and 3-month period for non-ablative lasers. 10. Any neurotoxin injection to the face or neck during the 6-month period before study treatment 11. Subjects using any treatment skincare products must discontinue use of these products 2 weeks before the start of participating in this clinical study and for the duration of the study. 12. Subjects with scarring in the treatment areas, which in the opinion of the investigator could impact results. Subjects with a history of keloids will be excluded. 13. Subjects who spray tanned or used sunless tanners in the treatment areas 1-month prior to study treatment. 14. History of connective tissue disease (e.g., lupus, scleroderma), history of Bell's Palsy, history of smoking. 15. Inability to ambulate following the procedure. 16. Individuals with known allergies or sensitivities to any of the ingredients of any topical or injectable products being used in this study. 17. Current participation or participation within 30 days prior to the start of this study in a drug or other investigational research study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Griffith ScaleBaseline, Week 6 and Week12Modified Griffiths 10-point scale to be used for investigator grading of cutaneous signs of photoaging on the face. Global Fine Lines. Scale 0 (no fine lines) to 9 (numerous, many fine lines) Overall Hyperpigmentation: Scale 0 (no hyperpigmentation) to 9 (significant hyperpigmentation) Skin Tone Eveness: Scale 0 (very even tone) to 9 (uneven, discolored appearance) Skin Elasticity: Score 0 (skin feels toned and dense) to 9 (skin feels thin and flabby) Skin Firmness: Score 0 (firm, tight feeling) to 9 (loose, lax feeling) Skin Radiance: Score 0 (very radiant, luminous, glowing) to 9 (very dull) Skin Texture: Score 0 (very smooth) to 9 (very rough)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physician Global Aesthetic Improvement ScaleWeek 12Physician Grading: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Improved 4. No Change 5. Worse
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement ScaleWeek 12Subject Grading: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Improved 4. No Change 5. Worse
Subject Self-Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline, Week 6 and Week 12Circle One Skin Feels More Comfortable: Agree Strongly Agree Neither Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree Strongly Skin Appears Younger Looking: Agree Strongly Agree Neither Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree Strongly Skin Appears Healthier: Agree Strongly Agree Neither Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree Strongly Skin Looks Renewed/Revitalized: Agree Strongly Agree Neither Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree Strongly Skin Looks Firmer: Agree Strongly Agree Neither Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree Strongly Skin Feels Elastic : Agree Strongly Agree Neither Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree Strongly Redness Looks Reduced: Agree Strongly Agree Neither Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree Strongly

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAndrea Pacheco
andrea.pacheco@platinumderm.com858-657-1004

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 1, 2026