Skip to content

Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Treatment in Tendinopathies

Multicenter Real-World Evidence (RWE) Study: Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Treatment in Tendinopathies

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07558564
Acronym
RWE-TDP-PRP
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2026-04-30
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2028-03-01
Last updated
2026-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellar Tendinopathy, Achilles Tendinopathy (AT), Epicondylitis, Lateral, Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic

Keywords

tendinopathy, Real World Evidence (RWE), platelet-rich plasma, plantar fasciosis, epicondylitis, patellar tendon, Achilles tendon

Brief summary

This multicenter, prospective, observational study, based on real-world evidence (RWE), aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) treatment across four types of tendinopathies: patellar, Achilles, epicondylar, and plantar fasciosis. Data collection and analysis will be conducted using the BioSmartData® platform, including hematology analyzers for PRP characterization, clinical variables, treatment protocols, and longitudinal assessment of therapeutic response.

Interventions

A minimal description of the standard PRP preparation and administration protocol will be included to document clinical variability and enable comparative analyses. Across all participating centers, the following variables will be systematically recorded: Type of PRP used (leukocyte-rich vs. leukocyte-poor), with standardized coding Preparation method (single vs. double centrifugation), including specification of the device used Injected volume Anatomical site and administration technique (ultrasound-guided whenever feasible) Number of treatment sessions and interval between sessions

Sponsors

ReSport Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER
BioSmartData
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical and/or ultrasound diagnosis of chronic tendinopathy (duration \>6 weeks) * Age \>18 years * Provision of written informed consent * Willingness and ability to complete follow-up assessments for 12 months

Exclusion criteria

* Surgical treatment of the affected tendon within the previous 6 months * Corticosteroid injection within the last month * Systemic inflammatory disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) * Coagulopathies or ongoing anticoagulant therapy * Complete blood count showing a platelet concentration \<100 × 10⁹/L (to exclude patients with potential thrombocytopenia) * Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog ScaleFrom baseline up to 12 months post-treatment
VISA-Pbaseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsChange in pain and functional limitation assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function and lower pain levels.
VISA-Abaseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsThe VISA-A is an eight item questionnaire measures Achilles tendon pain and function, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicating better function).
Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Scalebaseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsThe Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) is a 15-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure pain and functional disability in patients with lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow). It includes a 5-item pain subscale and a 10-item function subscale, providing a total score out of 100 to assess, evaluate, and monitor recovery.
Foot Function Indexbaseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsThe Foot Function Index (FFI) is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire designed to measure the impact of foot pathology on function, assessing pain, disability, and activity limitation. It uses a 0-10 Likert scale for items within three subscales, with higher total percentages (0-100%) indicating greater, more severe pain and dysfunction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Predictive factors of response to PRP treatmentbaselineIdentify clinical patterns predictive of better PRP treatment response using multivariate analysis and artificial intelligence
Adverse events1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsAssess the incidence of local or systemic adverse events following PRP administration

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTResport Clinic, MD PhD
abat@resportclinic.com+34 93 2778709
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFerran Abat Gonzalez, MD PhD

ReSport Clinic

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 1, 2026