Bile Duct Neoplasms, Cholangiocarcinoma, Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Conditions
Keywords
Cholangiocarcinoma, Percutaneous biliary drainage, Self-expanding metal stent, Suprapapillary drainage, Malignant hilar biliary obstruction, Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Brief summary
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is a condition in which the bile ducts near the liver become blocked due to cancer. This blockage can lead to jaundice (yellowing of the skin and eyes), itching, infection, and impaired liver function. To relieve the obstruction, doctors commonly perform procedures to drain bile and restore its flow. There are different techniques available for biliary drainage. One common method is percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is placed through the liver and across the natural opening of the bile duct into the intestine. Another approach is percutaneous suprapapillary drainage using a self-expanding metal stent, which allows bile to drain without crossing into the intestine and may reduce the risk of contamination and infection. Currently, there is no clear consensus on which of these two techniques is safer or more effective for patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. Some studies suggest that avoiding manipulation of the intestinal opening of the bile duct may reduce complications such as infection, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking. The purpose of this study is to compare percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent versus routine percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage in patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. The study aims to compare the rate of drainage-related complications between the two techniques, as well as to evaluate treatment success, stent patency, and the need for reintervention. In addition, in patients with potentially resectable disease undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, the study will assess and compare surgical outcomes between the two approaches. The results of this study may help determine the safest and most effective drainage strategy for these patients and improve future clinical decision-making.
Detailed description
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is most commonly associated with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and represents a complex clinical condition characterized by impaired bile flow at or above the hepatic duct confluence. The resulting cholestasis may lead to progressive hepatic dysfunction, increased risk of infectious complications, and reduced tolerance to systemic or surgical therapies. In selected patients, preoperative biliary drainage is performed to optimize liver function and reduce perioperative risk prior to major hepatectomy. Percutaneous biliary drainage is widely used in this setting due to its ability to selectively decompress specific hepatic segments, particularly in complex hilar strictures. The conventional approach consists of transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is advanced across the obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum. While effective in achieving biliary decompression, this technique may disrupt the function of the sphincter of Oddi and facilitate duodenobiliary reflux, which has been implicated as a potential mechanism for infectious complications. Percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent represents an alternative strategy. By avoiding transpapillary manipulation, this approach preserves sphincter function and may reduce bacterial contamination of the biliary tree. Early clinical data suggest a favorable safety profile, particularly regarding infectious outcomes; however, direct comparisons with conventional transpapillary drainage remain limited, and available studies are constrained by methodological limitations. An additional area of uncertainty relates to patients with potentially resectable disease. In this subgroup, the choice of drainage technique may influence not only peri-procedural outcomes but also subsequent surgical management. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential impact of metallic stents on operative complexity and resectability, although robust data are lacking. This randomized clinical trial is designed to compare two percutaneous drainage strategies within a standardized institutional framework. Patients with an indication for percutaneous biliary drainage will be allocated to receive either transpapillary internal-external drainage or suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent. The study includes both patients with unresectable disease and those with potentially resectable malignancies, allowing for evaluation across different clinical scenarios. All procedures will be performed by experienced interventional radiologists using uniform technical protocols, and patients will be managed according to institutional standards of care. Follow-up will include clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessment as appropriate to routine practice. The study is designed to generate comparative evidence regarding the safety and performance of these two techniques. In addition, a prespecified subgroup analysis will focus on patients with potentially resectable cholangiocarcinoma undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, in order to explore the impact of drainage strategy on subsequent surgical outcomes.
Interventions
PROCEDUREPercutaneous transpapillary internal-external biliary drainage
Percutaneous biliary drainage performed by advancing a catheter across the biliary obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum, allowing internal and external bile drainage.
PROCEDUREPercutaneous suprapapillary biliary drainage with self-expanding metal stent
Percutaneous biliary drainage performed by placing a self-expanding metal stent across the biliary obstruction without crossing the papilla.
Sponsors
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and do not meet any exclusion criteria will be divided into two clinical groups: Group A: Patients with potentially resectable neoplasms who meet criteria for biliary drainage as defined in the inclusion criteria. Group B: Patients who are not candidates for potentially curative surgical resection. Patients from both clinical groups will be randomized into two intervention groups: Intervention 1: Transpapillary internal-external drainage with a plastic catheter. Intervention 2: Suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age \>18 years. 2. Malignant proximal biliary obstruction on imaging (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography) with histopathological confirmation or high clinical and radiological suspicion. 3. Total bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL. 4. Patients not candidates for potentially curative surgical resection due to locally advanced disease, metastatic disease, or inadequate clinical condition. 5. Patients with potentially resectable neoplasms, defined as the possibility of achieving complete resection (R0), who meet at least one of the following criteria: 5.1 Estimated future liver remnant \<40%, in whom percutaneous portal vein embolization of the side to be resected will also be indicated after initial drainage. 5.2 Prolonged jaundice with total bilirubin \>10 mg/dL for more than 14 days. 5.3 Malnutrition, defined as ≥10% unintentional weight loss or albumin \<3 g/dL, presumably attributable to cholestasis. 5.4 Indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Exclusion criteria
1. Tumor with distal extension to the duodenal papilla, precluding suprapapillary drainage. 2. Prior biliary drainage procedure, either percutaneous (PTBD) or endoscopic (ERCP). 3. Acute cholangitis, clinically defined as fever (axillary temperature \>38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count \>10,000/mm³). 4. Uncorrectable coagulopathy. 5. Iodinated contrast allergy not amenable to desensitization.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Acute cholangitis | Within 90 days after intervention | Defined by clinical criteria, including fever (axillary temperature \>38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count \>10,000/mm³), in the absence of another infectious source on abdominal and chest imaging. |
| Acute cholecystitis | Within 90 days after intervention | Defined by radiological evidence of cholecystitis associated with fever (axillary temperature \>38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count \>10,000/mm³). |
| Acute pancreatitis | Within 90 days after intervention | Defined by the presence of at least two of the following criteria: abdominal pain consistent with pancreatitis, elevation of amylase and/or lipase greater than three times the upper limit of normal, or characteristic imaging findings. |
| Bile leak | Within 90 days after intervention | Defined as intra-abdominal bile leakage due to biliary perforation or at the hepatic puncture site, confirmed by imaging. |
| Hemorrhage | Within 90 days after intervention | Defined as clinical or radiological evidence of bleeding requiring blood transfusion or reintervention. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic success | Within 30 days after intervention | Defined as a decrease in total bilirubin to \<3 mg/dL or a reduction of more than 50% compared to pre-drainage levels |
| Mortality | Within 90 days after intervention | All-cause mortality following biliary drainage. |
| Need for reintervention | Within 30 days after intervention | Requirement for additional percutaneous or endoscopic procedures |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
CONTACTCleber R. P. Kruel, Professor
CONTACTGabriel L. da Silva, Attending Physician
STUDY_CHAIRCleber R. P. Kruel, Professor
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Outcome results
None listed