Skip to content

A Comparative Study of Erector Spinae Fascia (ESF) Injection and Dry Needling Combined With Functional Rehabilitation (FR) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Have Undergone Spinal Surgery (SPIN-NEED)

A Comparative Study of Erector Spinae Fascia (ESF) Injection and Dry Needling Combined With Functional Rehabilitation (FR) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Have Undergone Spinal Surgery (SPIN-NEED)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07555496
Acronym
SPIN-NEED
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-04-29
Start date
2026-09-07
Completion date
2029-03-31
Last updated
2026-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain Lower Back Chronic

Keywords

chronic back pain, infiltration, epineurium of the erector spinae muscles

Brief summary

Chronic low back pain represents a major public health issue, with an estimated prevalence of up to 23% in the adult population and a significant impact on quality of life and functional capacity. Among these patients, a significant proportion undergo spinal surgery-including laminectomy, discectomy, or spinal fusion-when conservative treatment has failed to provide adequate relief. Current treatment strategies involve functional spinal rehabilitation (FSR). Due to the multifaceted and complex pathophysiology of this chronic pain condition, we have previously addressed the spinal syndrome in terms of its functional and muscular component: the myofascial expression. In our clinical practice, we have introduced a minimally invasive paravertebral procedure, guided by ultrasound, targeting the fascia of the erector spinae muscles in the lower lumbar region. The goal of this procedure is to provide pain relief to the patient, enabling them to better adhere to the rehabilitative treatment (functional restoration of the spine) and ultimately improve the patient's quality of life within their environment. This evaluation of professional practices highlights a clear clinical indication in favor of infiltration of the erector spinae fascia, with a significant majority of patients reporting improved pain relief and better adherence to rehabilitation. Thus, within a coordinated, multidisciplinary care approach, this intervention appears to address patient expectations regarding comfort and leads us to consider the myofascial component of the complaint. The proposed paravertebral intervention is also appropriate in accordance with the updated recommendations, which are very restrictive in the context of a surgically treated spine (PSPS-2). This assessment of current practices justifies the implementation of a prospective controlled study. Through this study, we aim to investigate the treatment's effects and evaluate its pharmacological (via the anti-inflammatory action of corticosteroids) and mechanical (via needle-induced muscle stimulation) components.

Interventions

PROCEDUREinfiltration of the erector spinae fascia

Injection of half a vial of Diprostene 1.5 mL + Lidocaine 1.5 mL-under ultrasound guidance-targeting the erector spinae muscles medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-bilaterally

PROCEDUREDry needling

Dry needle insertion guided by ultrasound, with manipulation targeting the spinal erector muscles medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-on both sides.

PROCEDUREPlacebo

simulated procedure (non-invasive puncture with a stylet in the lower lumbar region, medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-on both sides).

Sponsors

Clinique de la Côte d'Emeraude
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with chronic back pain, with previous surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with specific or common low back pain * Patients receiving posterior subcutaneous spinal cord stimulation * Patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months * Patients with a contraindication to corticosteroid injections (coagulation disorder) * Pregnant or breastfeeding patients * Patients with cognitive and/or psychobehavioral disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in lumbar functional disabilitybetween day 0 (intervention) and 3 months after interventionassessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain evaluationday 0, 1 month, 3 monthsAssessed by visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Quality of life evaluationDay 0, 1 month, 3 monthsMeasured by Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) : The SF-36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100 (Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability)
lumbar function evaluationDay 0, 1 month, 3 monthsmuscle and functional performance measured using metrological score SHIRADO ITO
Measuring the patient's avoidance behaviorsDay 0, 1 month, 3 monthsAssessed by Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) : The complete FABQ is administered as a single 16-item questionnaire. Patients rate each item on a 7-point scale: 0 = completely disagree, 6 = completely agree.

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTMarion Mandon, PhD
mmandon@vivcalto-sante.com+33 6 78 27 76 72
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJulien Baglione-Streliski, MD

Emerald Coast Clinic

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 12, 2026