Skip to content

Post-Extraction Healing: microRepair vs Chlorhexidine

Evaluation of Healing in Post-Extraction Sockets Using microRepair Abx Mousse Mouthwash Versus 0.20% Chlorhexidine

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07555366
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-04-29
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endodontic Issue, Periodontal Issues

Keywords

tooth extraction, abx, chx

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial evaluates the efficacy of a microRepair ABX mouthwash mousse compared to 0.20% chlorhexidine in promoting wound healing following tooth extraction. The study monitors clinical parameters such as pain, swelling, and healing indices at 1, 7, and 15 days post-surgery. The primary objective is to determine if the microRepair ABX technology enhances tissue regeneration and reduces post-operative complications.

Detailed description

The study aims to prospectively analyze the clinical action of two different topical agents on post-surgical wounds: a mousse containing biomimetic microparticles (microRepair ABX) and a standard 0.20% chlorhexidine liquid mouthwash. Patients scheduled for extraction due to endodontic or periodontal issues will be randomized into two treatment groups. The protocol includes a baseline assessment (T0) and subsequent clinical evaluations at 24 hours (T1), 7 days (T2), and 15 days (T3). Primary endpoints consist of plaque presence on the surgical wound, gingival texture, and pain levels measured via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints include swelling (edema), odor, tooth or prosthesis pigmentation, and oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14). Wound healing progress is objectively quantified using the Clinical Healing Index (CHI), which assesses seven parameters: redness, edema, bleeding, pain on palpation, suppuration, granulation tissue, and the degree of epithelialization. Additionally, the study evaluates patient satisfaction and the "pleasantness" of the assigned product, while recording any adverse events or sensitivities during home application.

Interventions

OTHERmicroRepair ABX Mousse

Topical application of the mousse on the surgical wound starting from the day after the extraction. The mousse is specifically formulated to promote healing through microparticles that accelerate tissue repair and an antibacterial complex to prevent localized infections.

OTHERCHX mouthwash 0.20%

Application of 0.20% Chlorhexidine liquid mouthwash. Used as a control treatment to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the test product in reducing plaque, pain, and inflammation while promoting socket healing.

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age range: Patients between 18 and 75 years of age. Indication for tooth extraction: Specifically for cases involving: * Destructive caries that do not allow for conservative or prosthetic recovery. * Untreatable endodontic and/or periapical lesions. * Advanced periodontal lesions with significant loss of supporting tissue. * Traumatic lesions involving root fractures (vertical or at the middle third). * Malpositioned teeth causing functional alterations. * Roots that cannot be prosthetically recovered or residual roots.

Exclusion criteria

Age: Patients under 18 or over 75 years of age. Systemic Conditions: Presence of immunodepression or immunocompromisation (e.g., HIV infection). Pregnancy and Lactation: Women who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding. Mental Health: Presence of psychiatric disorders. Tobacco Use: Severe smokers, defined as consuming more than 10 cigarettes per day. Substance Abuse: History of alcohol or drug abuse.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plaque Index at the Tooth Extraction SiteFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 daysAssessment of the presence or absence of visible bacterial plaque at the tooth extraction site, recorded as a dichotomous variable (Yes/No). The absence of plaque indicates better oral hygiene and a lower risk of postoperative infection.
Gingival Condition of the Peri-Alveolar TissueFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 daysEvaluation of the gingival tissue surrounding the extraction socket based on the presence or absence of clinical signs of inflammation (e.g., redness, edema), recorded as a dichotomous variable (Yes/No). The absence of inflammation indicates healthier gingival tissue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction with the ProductAt 15 days post-treatmentAssessment of patient-reported satisfaction with the product using a structured questionnaire administered at the end of the treatment period. The questionnaire will evaluate overall acceptability of the product, including: * taste * comfort during application * perceived effectiveness * preference compared to traditional treatment * perceived improvement in sensitivity Each item will be recorded as a dichotomous variable (Yes/No) (e.g., satisfied vs. not satisfied). Higher frequency of positive responses indicates greater patient satisfaction.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTFabrizio Guerra
fabrizio.guerra@uniroma1.it3283150627

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 30, 2026